Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread dnk
On 28-Jul-08, at 10:29 AM, Sergio Minini (NETKEY) wrote: +1 for spamdyke The best solution ever to help QM against spam. www.spamdyke.org. Good luck- Sergio +2 Huge reduction in spam for me. d

RE: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Sergio Minini (NETKEY)
+1 for spamdyke The best solution ever to help QM against spam. www.spamdyke.org. Good luck- Sergio -Original Message- From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:05 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM t

RE: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread António Pedro Lima
I would look into spamdyke, trust me. I was stressing with spam, and was looking into RBLs and sa-updates, etc etc etc… Tried spamdyke and my stress was gone. You probably will need to tune it a little, but will be once. For my case at least it was… António Pedro Lima _ De: Jake V

Re: [qmailtoaster] (OT) Capacity planning

2008-07-28 Thread Aleph
Dear Minini! If you will run W2K3/IIS then you run W2k3/IIS. But if you will LAMP server, then you not irritate us. Please you find a simpathic distro, and you put a question to us. Aleph 2008/7/28 Sergio Minini (NETKEY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hey there, > A customer was asked to plan for a web

[qmailtoaster] (OT) Capacity planning

2008-07-28 Thread Sergio Minini (NETKEY)
Hey there, A customer was asked to plan for a web server's hardware, with a daily 10k hits and video streaming/download files of 2-5mins. Thats the only data he was given and he's clueless, so he asked us for some help. I am not sure either. Supposing it will run on LAMP, which are the recomende

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Jake Vickers
Alberto Maffini wrote: Ok :-) My question was "What I have to put inside those files to fight spam ?" ... Sorry for not explain correctly .. To get the defaults back (should be your first move) look at the wiki - I believe we have all the files documented on there with the defaults: http

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Anil Aliyan
For blacklists please refer to this link http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/RBLs - Original Message - From: Alberto Maffini To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 5:04 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam Hi List...I succ

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Anil Aliyan
isa, 250 Sesto San Giovanni (MI) Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608 http://www.sylcomed.com __ Informazione NOD32 3302 (20080728) __ Questo messaggio è stato controllato dal Sistema Antivirus NOD32 http://www.nod32.it __ Informazione NOD32 3302 (20080728) __ Questo messaggio è stato controllato dal Sistema Antivirus NOD32 http://www.nod32.it

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Anil Aliyan
badmailfrom You can block email from reaching your server by adding email or domain name to /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom If you add [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamerhome.com Your email server will not accept any email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and any email account @spamerhome.com - Origi

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Alberto Maffini
ed sender) Thanks a lot Alberto Maffini mobile +39.348.3677402 Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250 Sesto San Giovanni (MI) Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608 http://www.sylcomed.com __ Informazione NOD32 3302 (20080728) __

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Anil Aliyan
Thanks a lot Alberto Maffini mobile +39.348.3677402 Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250 Sesto San Giovanni (MI) Tel +39.02.2427557 Fax +39.02.2400608 http://www.sylcomed.com __ Informazione NOD32 3302 (20080728) __ Questo messaggio è stato controllato dal Sistema Antivirus NOD32 http://www.nod32.it

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Alberto Maffini
SUB_OBFU_Q1 autolearn=no version=3.1.8 Received-SPF: pass (ns2.qmailtoaster.com: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender) Thanks a lot Alberto Maffini mobile +39.348.3677402 Sylco S.r.l.Via Pisa, 250 Sesto San Giovanni (MI) Tel

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Jake Vickers
Alberto Maffini wrote: Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 month ago I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 sec). I found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I deleted /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/q

Re: [qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Janno Sannik
get the packages. rebuild them (might not even be necessary) and extract the needed configuration files from packages. my spamassassin configuration has following new lines (5 points is still the spam limit): skip_rbl_checks 0 score BAYES_994.9 score DRUGS_ERECTILE

[qmailtoaster] Hardening QM to fight spam

2008-07-28 Thread Alberto Maffini
Hi List...I successfully run a QMT mailserver since 2 years ago. 1 month ago I had a problem. For some reason my delivery was very slow (approx 30 sec). I found that the problem was Spamhaus checking. Due to my stupidity I deleted /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and /var/qmail/control/blacklists a

Re: [qmailtoaster] Do not check spam with some IP address

2008-07-28 Thread Ariel
in /etc/mail/spamassins/local.cfg add: whitelist_from a.b.c.d ---> ip address. o email addres : whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] o domin internet : whitelist:from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008/7/27 Truong Duc Luong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi list > > I use qmailtoaster. I need to config my mail se