Re: [qmailtoaster] anti spam and antivirus don´t sh ow in header

2010-01-04 Thread Amit
Hi Anderson, As I thought, simscan is not getting run. Please find content of my tcp.smtp file below: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private" :allow,BADMIMETYPE="",SENDER_NOCHECK="1",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="100",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10", QMAILQUE

Re: [qmailtoaster] anti spam and antivirus don´t sh ow in header

2010-01-04 Thread Anderson Alves de Albuquerque
$ cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private" :allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private" $ ps xa PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 1

Re: [qmailtoaster] anti spam and antivirus don´t sh ow in header

2010-01-04 Thread Amit
Hi Anderson, It seems like simscan is not getting run. Please post the content of "/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp" file. Amit On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Anderson Alves de Albuquerque < anderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I install Qmail toaster in CentOS 5.4, when I receive or sent e-mail in >

[qmailtoaster] anti spam and antivirus don´t show in header

2010-01-04 Thread Anderson Alves de Albuquerque
I install Qmail toaster in CentOS 5.4, when I receive or sent e-mail in the header I don´t see information about anti virus or anti spam. I should see in header some information about Anti virus and anti spam, what is wrong? Look: SquirrelMail 1.4.19-1.3.15 *Return-Path:* > *Delivered-To:

[qmailtoaster] Re: Has something changed in QT?

2010-01-04 Thread Eric Shubert
Do you have the latest qmailtoaster-plus and qmailtoaster-plus.repo packages when you do this? You'll need the latest of both. I'm not sure what that ISO does regarding updating. Patrick Ring wrote: Interesting I notice now that there are 2 kernels listed in the splash screen (grub)(...one

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Has something changed in QT?

2010-01-04 Thread Patrick Ring
Interesting I notice now that there are 2 kernels listed in the splash screen (grub)(...one is SMP and the other is not). I'll check on that. However, "newmodel" errors out at the same spot if I install QMT ISO, reboot, and run newmodel (no "yum update"). I'll check that though. Thanks, Pa

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Has something changed in QT?

2010-01-04 Thread Maxwell Smart
Are you certain you're booting the proper kernel. I ran into the very same problem and never did figure out how to get it to boot into the proper kernel. CJ On 01/04/2010 03:51 PM, Patrick Ring wrote: > OK. I finally got back to working on this. (sorry for the delay) > > I tried a "yum install

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Has something changed in QT?

2010-01-04 Thread Patrick Ring
OK. I finally got back to working on this. (sorry for the delay) I tried a "yum install kernel-smp-devel" (installed/complete), rebooted, then tried running the newmodel script. Got the same errors. Should I attempt to download/build the fuse and see where this takes me? My goal, originally, w

[qmailtoaster] Re: The "Brilliant" SA Y210K bugfix...NOT!

2010-01-04 Thread Eric Shubert
Nigel Reed wrote: I must have missed where you offered an better alternative to the one provided. Thanks, Nigel --- On Mon, 1/4/10, Tim Pleiman wrote: From: Tim Pleiman Subject: [qmailtoaster] The "Brilliant" SA Y210K bugfix...NOT! To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Date: Monday, Janua

Re: [qmailtoaster] The "Brilliant" SA Y210K bugfix...NOT!

2010-01-04 Thread Nigel Reed
I must have missed where you offered an better alternative to the one provided. Thanks, Nigel --- On Mon, 1/4/10, Tim Pleiman wrote: > From: Tim Pleiman > Subject: [qmailtoaster] The "Brilliant" SA Y210K bugfix...NOT! > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 1