[qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Graylist Delay

2010-07-01 Thread Thiago - TI - Realeza
Hello all I have some “trouble” here. For example, when I receive a message and spamdyke graylist it, I have an delay about 20 minutes to the message be delivered on my mailbox. Here is a log 07-01 10:37:50 spamdyke[17408]: DENIED_GRAYLISTED from: mailerweb.boletim.geh...@gehaka.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Graylist Delay

2010-07-01 Thread Martin Waschbuesch
Hi there, This is very normal behaviour. Graylisting not only depends on your server's timing settings, but on the behavior of the sending MTA. If that MTA does not retry within a given time (that is what you can configure) the mail will not be delivered, but regarded as spam. However, the time

RES: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Graylist Delay

2010-07-01 Thread Thiago - TI - Realeza
Yes... could make sense Do you think that I have to change max/min secs from graylist? Thanks Martin Thiago -Mensagem original- De: Martin Waschbuesch [mailto:mar...@waschbuesch.de] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 1 de julho de 2010 11:36 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto:

Re: RES: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Graylist Delay

2010-07-01 Thread Martin Waschbuesch
On a server I use it on, I have left the default settings intact. The timing settings you posted look like the default to me, so, I think all is in order. You just have to be aware that graylisting causes delays. Note: If you look at the graylist-max-secs=2678400, that means 44640 minutes or 74

RES: RES: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Graylist Delay

2010-07-01 Thread Thiago - TI - Realeza
Great... I´ll keep looking Thanks again! Thiago -Mensagem original- De: Martin Waschbuesch [mailto:mar...@waschbuesch.de] Enviada em: quinta-feira, 1 de julho de 2010 11:49 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto: Re: RES: [qmailtoaster] Spamdyke Graylist Delay On a server

[qmailtoaster] Dovecot installation and evaluation

2010-07-01 Thread Rajesh M
hi all and eric thanks very much for you help especially you eric, i was able to do a successful migration from courier to dovecot. i changed over from courier to dovecot a few weeks ago. i am very satisfied with the same. With courier my webmail was causing quite a bit of load on my server whic

[qmailtoaster] Re: RES: Spamdyke Graylist Delay

2010-07-01 Thread Eric Shubert
There is another aspect to graylist-max-secs. This parameter limits the time that a graylist entry is valid. See http://spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#GRAYLISTS at the end of the section. You should also note that spamdyke itself does not provide for cleaning up graylist entries. You

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: RES: Spamdyke Graylist Delay

2010-07-01 Thread Scott Hughes
Eric, Where can one obtain the magic graylist trimming script and what time frame would you suggest for running it? Weekly perhaps? Thanks, Scott On Jul 1, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > There is another aspect to graylist-max-secs. This parameter limits the time > that a graylist

[qmailtoaster] Re: RES: Spamdyke Graylist Delay

2010-07-01 Thread Eric Shubert
It's included in the latest QTP. It's not listed/documented on the wiki yet though. I misspoke earlier. It appears as though I already included the installation of qtp-prune-spamdyke in the qtp-install-spamdyke script. If you have a qtp-prune-spamdyke script in /etc/cron.daily/ then it's alre

[qmailtoaster] spam email routing query

2010-07-01 Thread Rajesh M
hi the current system is such that all the emails that are spam (ie between 5 and 8) get tagged as spam in subject line and are are routed to the SPAM folder which can be viewed via squirrelmail my questions 1) is it possible to route these to a common mailbox which will be monitored by a system