On 04/19/2011 06:20 PM, Scott Hughes wrote:
On 4/19/11 6:17 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
They're the same value in a QMT I just checked.
Please post the log lines you're talking about (using qmlog formatting
if you don't mind).
I will post an example of an exact match as soon as I see the next on
On 4/19/11 6:17 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
They're the same value in a QMT I just checked.
Please post the log lines you're talking about (using qmlog formatting
if you don't mind).
I will post an example of an exact match as soon as I see the next one
come through (should be tomorrow). Here
Thanks! That solvde everything
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:50 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: hostname
/var/qmail/control/smtpgreeting perhaps?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 04/19/2011 0
/var/qmail/control/smtpgreeting perhaps?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 04/19/2011 04:38 PM, mattias wrote:
Both from a local telnet from the server
And from my client-computer here
Allredy tried a reboot
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 20
Both from a local telnet from the server
And from my client-computer here
Allredy tried a reboot
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:30 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: hostname
On 04/19/201
On 04/19/2011 04:21 PM, mattias wrote:
I chaned a hostname on a server from localhost in the following files
/etc/sysconfig/network
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
/var/qmail/control/me
But qmail still report localhost
--
*smile* yes a vmware on a windows 2003 server
But no vps company here a private physical server
Running vmware with a older qmail on centos 4.8 I think
-Original Message-
From: Fred Christian [mailto:fr...@gloryofgod.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:27 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmail
I had a similar problem. I am on a VPS. I had to change the hostname
in my VPS control panel before it would stick. Maybe your system is
set up in a similar way.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:21 PM, mattias wrote:
> I chaned a hostname on a server from localhost in the following files
> /etc/sysconfi
When I rebuilt/reinstalled simscan-toaster to fix the mailformed header
problem, it clobbered my simcontrol file settings (they were backed up
by qtp-newmodel though).
Jake, that file should probably be coded as config(noreplace) in the
spec file. No?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
I chaned a hostname on a server from localhost in the following files
/etc/sysconfig/network
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
/var/qmail/control/me
But qmail still report localhost
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored
They're the same value in a QMT I just checked.
Please post the log lines you're talking about (using qmlog formatting
if you don't mind).
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 04/19/2011 02:37 PM, Scott Hughes wrote:
Here is where my confusion comes in.
If I look in the SMTP log, I see that a message is sc
Here is where my confusion comes in.
If I look in the SMTP log, I see that a message is scored a 2.10 on the
SIMSCAN line. When I look in the SPAMD log, I see the message is scored a
-98.
If Spamassassin is giving both scores, why is there a difference in scores?
Thanks,
Scott
-Original M
Sounds like the lock files might have screwed things up. I'd make sure
there's no unison running, then remove all the lock files on both sides.
On 04/19/2011 10:17 AM, Scott Hughes wrote:
*From:*Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:02 AM
*To:* qmailtoas
Thanks Eric. Now I have to figure out why Spamassassin isn't scoring these
emails lower as I have them in my local.cf as a whilelist.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 12:49 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.c
Simscan is just a controller of sorts, that invokes spamassassin (and
clamav). SA does all scoring.
Yes, the score in the smtp log is simply what spamassassin determined,
and passed back to simscan.
On 04/19/2011 09:17 AM, Scott Hughes wrote:
What I have been looking for is coming from SIMSC
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:j...@qmailtoaster.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:02 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Replication
On 04/18/2011 04:57 PM, Scott Hughes wrote:
# */10 * * * * root /usr/local/sbin/sync-qmail >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
*/1
What I have been looking for is coming from SIMSCAN. Example:
"@40004dadb18d21bb085c simscan:[14223]:CLEAN
(3.60/8.00):9.6446s:***SPAM***
:216.157.241.10:bounce-339012-130...@listserv.ncmpt76.com:joey@renshawauto.c
om"
Am I incorrect in this? Is this actually a report back to the SMTP log of
All,
What I mean is that something gives the email an initial score before it is
run through Spamassassin (If I am remembering correctly). I can see it in
the SMTP log. When I look at the same email in the SPAMD log, I see that it
has a -98 score (which it should). If that inital score is above
On 04/18/2011 04:57 PM, Scott Hughes wrote:
# */10 * * * * root /usr/local/sbin/sync-qmail >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
*/10 * * * * root /usr/local/sbin/sync-qmail
I just got an email from cron on my postmaster account that reads:
"/bin/sh: root: command not found"
And when you remove "root"
Pak,
I'm not sure what you mean since the script is therex
On Apr 18, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Pak Ogah wrote:
> Scott,
> when I check the wiki, it don't have the code. May I edit it?
>
> On 04/17/11 4:04, Scott Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Just so Eric won't have to ask me (har har har):
>>
>> http://wi
Pak,
Sorry, hit the send button accidentlly. If something needs to be edited, please
feel free to edit it.
Thanks,
Scott
On Apr 18, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Pak Ogah wrote:
> Scott,
> when I check the wiki, it don't have the code. May I edit it?
>
> On 04/17/11 4:04, Scott Hughes wrote:
>>
>>
21 matches
Mail list logo
