Hi Eric.
Updated clamav-toaster.
So far running fine - will report if anything occurs (related to Clamav
ofcourse ;-)).
Centos 5.8 - 64 bit version / Intel Atom
Latest and greatest QMT
Regards,
Finn B.
On 03/20/2012 04:25 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
clamav 0.97.4 release was announced 3/15
On Tuesday 20 March 2012 08:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
clamav 0.97.4 release was announced 3/15/2012.
clamav-toaster-0.97.4-1.4.0.src.rpm is available for testing. I've
built and installed it on 32,64 bit test machines with no problem. You
can find the rpm at http://qmailtoaster.com/testing/ (
That looks ok to me, provided that my_server_hostname is your domain
name (mydomain.com) as opposed to your QMT's host name (mail.mydomain.com).
Can you help us examine an example that did not get tapped? I'm
wondering which sender address is being tapped. There are two sender
addresses in an
On 03/20/2012 05:31 AM, Bharath Chari wrote:
Are we promoting clamav to the 1.4.0 branch?
I figured I would, as 1.4.0 updates all upstream packages to current.
Do you see any problem with this?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Hi Eric,
my_server_hostname is not the same as my host name.
Find below an example message:
>From - Tue Mar 20 18:51:41 2012
X-Account-Key: account3
X-UIDL: 1332262102.9077.server_name,S=2155
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: delsio.c
I think I know what's happening. The bounces are coming from QMT itself.
The bounce message is going to a local address, so qmail-send passes it
on to qmail-local which delivers it. qmail-smtp never sees the bounce.
The taps patch is part of qmail-smtp. Thus, the message is never seen by
taps.
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the explanation. I am planning to move to that direction only
after I get a new NAS storage. For now I am using the same server for all
qmt services and it works wonderfully.
Tapping failure messages would be quite useful for client support. What
about changing the source code?
Hello,
anyone may tell me if there is any updates on scripts to install
qmailtoaster on CentOS 6 without any issues?
Thanks.
