RE: [qmailtoaster] CNAME lloup fail

I used the solution to fix the cname issue is, # yum install pdns-recursor # service pdns-recursor start # chkconfig pdns-recursor on Then change /etc/resolv.conf to be: nameserver 127.0.0.1 ITS WORK FOR ME, but can anyone told me is there will any future disadvantages. Regards,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Mailer -daemon failure notice

Thanks Eric, I will change the password and let me see. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: On 08/25/2013 07:47 PM, ChandranManikandan wrote: Hi Eric, Yes, Sure it's bounce message come from my server . how to prevent this message. Determine the account

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: slow accessing webmail

Is your webmail running on the same host as QMT? Yes What is the load on the host when this occurs? No load, nearly 40 to 60 %used RAM and processor is used between 10 to 20$ Are you accessing large mailboxes with courier? Yes Regards, Vivek Patil system admin -Original Message-

[qmailtoaster] Re: CNAME lloup fail

I know of no disadvantages. This is the setup I recommend. pdns-recursor might become 'stock' at some point if there are no objections. As Dan has pointed out, QMT doesn't actually need an onboard resolver, but it does need to use a resolver that works reliably. I think this is the simplest

[qmailtoaster] Re: slow accessing webmail

On 08/26/2013 12:29 AM, Linux wrote: Are you accessing large mailboxes with courier? Yes This is the problem Upgrading to dovecot will solve it. -- -Eric 'shubes' - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: CNAME lloup fail

Eric, et. al.: My feelings about PDNS are that: - PDNS is as good a resolver as there is, but as a project we shouldn't play favorites - PDNS would make an excellent OPTIONAL package -- but shouldn't necessarily be a pdns-toaster package... I would prefer that we just tell people how to

[qmailtoaster] Re: CNAME lloup fail

I'm not suggesting a QMT-specific package. (What would be the point?) Most of a 'stock' QMT includes packages that aren't *-toaster specific. I don't think it should necessarily be a requirement either. Choice is good. As Dan has pointed out, QMT doesn't *require* an onboard resolver. None

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: CNAME lloup fail

On 8/26/2013 3:52 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm not suggesting a QMT-specific package. (What would be the point?) Most of a 'stock' QMT includes packages that aren't *-toaster specific. I don't think it should necessarily be a requirement either. Choice is good. As Dan has pointed out, QMT

[qmailtoaster] Re: CNAME lloup fail

On 08/26/2013 02:15 PM, Dan McAllister wrote: On 8/26/2013 3:52 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm not suggesting a QMT-specific package. (What would be the point?) Most of a 'stock' QMT includes packages that aren't *-toaster specific. I don't think it should necessarily be a requirement either.

[qmailtoaster] How to remove cached and buffer memory in Centos server

Hi All, I had used this command and shows below result. #free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 103704169965280 405136 0 2264288775244 -/+ buffers/cache: 9636089406808 Swap: 40965641044096460 But

[qmailtoaster] Re: How to remove cached and buffer memory in Centos server

On 08/26/2013 08:07 PM, ChandranManikandan wrote: Hi All, I had used this command and shows below result. #free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 103704169965280 405136 0 2264288775244 -/+ buffers/cache: 963608

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: slow accessing webmail

Thanks Eric, I will upgrade courier imap with dovecot. Can you give me the steps or link to guide for the upgrading. Regards, Vivek Patil system admin -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 11:21 PM To: