Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS issue with Spamdyke v5.0.1

2022-12-27 Thread Eric Broch
It looks like the start of the connection at 18:37:41 and when the timeout occurs at 18:42:03 is a pretty big chunk of time. The idle timeout in you spamdyke file is 60 seconds. This doesn't sound like a problem with TLS. It seems like a problem with the time of negotiation. How busy is your se

Re: [qmailtoaster] TLS issue with Spamdyke v5.0.1

2022-12-27 Thread nowuknow
This particular log was when I was testing idle timeout of 300 seconds in Spamdyke, thus the longer delay. Overall, the server is not that busy (avg 1-1.5), but will keep an eye out for peak loads that may coincide with timeouts. On 12/27/22 18:29, Eric Broch wrote: It looks like the start