Any interest in getting DomainKeys (http://qmail.org/qmail-1.03-dk-0.53.patch)
into QmailToaster?
Would be fairly useful I think (along with SPF which is already there).
Ray
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:21:36AM -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
> Pedro Costa wrote:
>
> >Hi All
> >
> >What must be used to put QMAILTOASTER authentication against a RAIDUS
> >server.
> >
> >
> >
> To the best of my knowledge, it can't.
If qmail can do any sort of PAM authentication (no idea if i
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:47:06PM +0530, Anish Shaikh wrote:
> No Sender ID is not SPF, it is based on SPF, but still the if SPF
> entries are made the Sender ID tests are also passed and i will be
> fine with that, but what about Domain Keys, we have this
> http://qmail.org/qmail-1.03-dk-0.53.pat
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 03:58:43PM -0800, Alex wrote:
> When I try to remove the old clamav, I get the error. Should I do rpm -e
> --no-deps clamav-toaster-0.87.1-1.2.10.
>
> rpm -e clamav-toaster-0.87.1-1.2.10
> error: Failed dependencies:
> clamav-toaster is needed by (installed)
> sims
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:50:51AM -0600, Robin Sánchez wrote:
>
> Im tired creating and creating rules with SpamAssin because is not enough.
> Somebody known how block the major quantity of SPAM specially VIAGRA?
> because Im Tired!!
>
Probably your best bet is to get a nice source of spam and
Are any of you using simscan/clamdscan with a remote clamd server? I've
seen some kludgy ways to do it involving NFS. Too bad clamdscan doesn't
provide a parameter to talk to a remote clamd server running in TCP mode.
Ray
-
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Carrigan, Jeremy wrote:
> I upgraded ClamAV to version 0.88.1 yet when I view the e-mail header it still
> shows 0.87.1 as follows:
>
> Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 8736, pid: 8737, t: 2.8075s
>
> scanners: clamav: 0.87.1/m:36/d:1365 spam: 3.
Any reason not to make local.cf %config(noreplace) ? Just did an rpm -Uvh
and it clobbered my customized file.
Have a backup, but still seems it would be preferrable to have a .rpmnew
file for manual review instead of just automatically overwriting the old
one?
--
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 11:11:51AM -0700, Nathan Grennan wrote:
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >Any reason not to make local.cf %config(noreplace) ? Just did an rpm -Uvh
> >and it clobbered my customized file.
> >
> >Have a backup, but still seems it would be preferrable to
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:26:40AM -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
> I just discovered that sa-update exists (it's not mentioned in my (2 year
> old) book. I'm wondering how toaster users get SA rule updates.
>
> Is anyone running sa-update, or using an expanded set of SA rules, or does
> everyone sim
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:23:26PM +0300, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> After upgrading qmailtoaster I found out that badmimetypes was
> blocking all .exe and certain .zip attachments without a warning in
> the smtp log or to the sender. So I removed usage of badmimetypes from
> my toaster as I have atta
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:45:41PM -0700, Dairenn Lombard wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Load averages on our Qmail toaster are out of control, and we're seeing
> clamd and spamd the culprit. How do we run Qmail on the server without
> spamd and clamd running?
Edit /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and disable
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:54:08PM -0700, Dairenn Lombard wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:45:41PM -0700, Dairenn Lombard wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Load averages on our Qmail toaster are out of control, and we're
> > > seeing clamd and spamd the culprit. How do we run Qmail on
> > th
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:16:51AM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> I have a central server that runs SPAMD for my other servers and would like
> to setup my qmailtoaster server to also point to this external SPAMD
> daemon. I tried to do this by modifying the RPM spec file and adding
>
> --enable-spam
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:08:45AM -0700, Eric Shubes wrote:
> Is anyone running the toaster with Razor?
I was for a while... but stopped. I think they only allow non-commercial
use (we're an ISP) and probably we were hammering them a little hard. Also
their servers can bog down and when it does
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 09:50:25AM -0400, Kaven Gagnon wrote:
> I found something new in qmail send log:
>
> @400044eef2220e3250c4 starting delivery 1: msg 350458 to local
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> @400044eef2220e325894 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
> @400044eef2220f0a2a94 delivery 1: def
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:51:24AM -0400, Kaven Gagnon wrote:
> Thanks for you're reply, but I already try this without success. I'm really
> struck... I've check every file one by one for permissions, settings... the
> whole kit!
Well, if you still want to try one more thing on the "old" server,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 12:08:30PM -0700, Nolan Garrett wrote:
> I'm using the Qmail Toaster package from www.qmailtoaster.com. Approximately
> every 24 hours, clients are unable to connect to vpopmail/Qmail, and the
> following error is in my /var/log/qmail/authlib/current file:
>
> vmysql: sql
18 matches
Mail list logo
