Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Carlos Herrera Polo
Try djbdns... 2011/8/6, Maxwell Smart : > Scott Hughes wrote: >> >> Yes. That are. I don't want anyone being able to resolve anything other >> that what I provide. >> >> I do want to use dig and nslookup on the console / ssh session. >> >> Scott >> >> > I see, that's a bit different setup than min

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Maxwell Smart
Scott Hughes wrote: Yes. That are. I don't want anyone being able to resolve anything other that what I provide. I do want to use dig and nslookup on the console / ssh session. Scott I see, that's a bit different setup than mine.  Your acting as the gate keeper.  I

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Maxwell Smart
Dan, I don't have recursion on my DNS server and it resolves correctly from the server.  My internal LAN use the ISP DNS server. SNIP recursion no;     notify yes;     forwarders {         206.13.28.12;         206.13.30.12;         };                                             }; zone ".

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Scott Hughes
Yes. That are. I don't want anyone being able to resolve anything other that what I provide. I do want to use dig and nslookup on the console / ssh session. Scott On Aug 6, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: > Scott Hughes wrote: >> I believe so. If it's not I'm gonna feel really stup

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Maxwell Smart
Scott Hughes wrote: I believe so. If it's not I'm gonna feel really stupid! lol I'll chech it in the AM. I do know that outside people can resolve ok. Scott On Aug 6, 2011, at 10:04 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: Scott Hughes wrote: For s

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Dan McAllister
You have only specified yourself as a recolving DNS server... and the configuration you have shown does not permit anyone (including yourself) to do recursion... thus, you will resolve domains for which you are a master server for, but nothing else (which is the RIGHT configuration for the Inte

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Scott Hughes
I believe so. If it's not I'm gonna feel really stupid! lol I'll chech it in the AM. I do know that outside people can resolve ok. Scott On Aug 6, 2011, at 10:04 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote: > Scott Hughes wrote: >> >> For some weird reason my DNS (not on qmail) is not forwarding requests for >>

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Maxwell Smart
Scott Hughes wrote: For some weird reason my DNS (not on qmail) is not forwarding requests for zones that aren't in it's zone files (like google.com).  If I 'dig' one of my zones, I get all the correct information.  If I 'dig' something like www.google.com I get nothing.  Here are the two files

Re: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Scott Hughes
t know where to go for zones it > does not have set up locally. > > ** ** > > *From:* Scott Hughes [mailto:sonicscott9...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, August 06, 2011 2:11 PM > *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > *Subject:* [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question***

RE: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Helmut Fritz
: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question For some weird reason my DNS (not on qmail) is not forwarding requests for zones that aren't in it's zone files (like google.com). If I 'dig' one of my zones, I get all the correct information. If I

[qmailtoaster] OT: Bind9 DNS question

2011-08-06 Thread Scott Hughes
For some weird reason my DNS (not on qmail) is not forwarding requests for zones that aren't in it's zone files (like google.com). If I 'dig' one of my zones, I get all the correct information. If I 'dig' something like www.google.com I get nothing. Here are the two files that I think control th