As I said before, the 1.4 branch will have source rpm's, of course. As
mentioned in the earlier e-mail
"2) The source distribution will be simpler in the rpm style, and
should compile more easily on any distribution
The bad side of #2 is that you will have to handle dependencies and
updates on yo
hmm.
I am not understant fully, in case of 1.4 brach, is it possible to have src
rpm, like now in case of 1.3 brach?
(i'am asking because of i'am using sometimes mandriva and customize qt for my
purposes, so i suppose i will have possibility to customize 1.4 also for myself
:) (i know about
As the Qmail code has been released as public domain now, it shall be
possible for full binary distributions!
E
On Nov 15, 2007 11:58 PM, Bryan Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
> Sounds like I better keep in tune and download CentOS then.
>
> For production servers I much prefer your
Hi Erik,
Sounds like I better keep in tune and download CentOS then.
For production servers I much prefer your binary approach as this is
more aligned to a 'toaster' solution.
Done my time fiddling with linux compatibility instead of functionality
and know where I prefer to be.
Thanks for your e
Hi,
Is there a path to Mandriva 2007?
Cheers
Bryan
> My recommendation would be, don't. Upgrade to CentOS 5. It has a
> longer life and will remain supported.
>
> The QmailToaster is primarily developed and tested on that.
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 11:51 AM, Diego Pivetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
By the way, a big thank you goes to Lightspeed Wireless. If you're in
Ohio or need colo space, please contact these guys. They are basically
hosting the entire development environment for the QmailToaster
project.
Not too make this too much of an ad, but http://www.wifi7.com/
Thanks,
Erik
On Nov
Hi Bryan,
Yes and no.
The future of QmailToaster lies in a binary path with automatic
updates. I have been takig my time as I am merging and testing. In
order to do this, two things will happen.
1) The supported OS's are CentOS 3, 4 & 5 x86_64 and 32 bit only
2) The source distribution will be s
My recommendation would be, don't. Upgrade to CentOS 5. It has a
longer life and will remain supported.
The QmailToaster is primarily developed and tested on that.
On Nov 15, 2007 11:51 AM, Diego Pivetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Olá list,
> I have plans to make upgrade of my server bein
Olá list,
I have plans to make upgrade of my server being modified of fedora 4 to fedora
8.
I would like to know if somebody already obtained success on to qmailtoaster in
fedora 8 and if somebody has some tip from as I can proceed to obtain to
install correctly.
Forgive me for my ugly English
