Hello,
How can i disable the RBLs check ?
I have many users that are useing pda's and i can't change the smtp port to
587.
I want this setting to be disabled, i don't want to something to the whitelist.
Thank you
If i comment the line RBLSMTPD=. from /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run
the smtp server is not running anymore.
Bogdan
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster
I thought so
Thanks it worked
Bogdan
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RBLs check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bogdan Peptine schrieb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bogdan Peptine schrieb:
| How can i disable the RBLs check ?
You can disable specific RBLs in
~ /var/qmail/control/blacklists
or remove rblsmtpd completely in
~ /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run
HTH,
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
. When you remove
~ $RBLSMTPD $BLACKLIST
from the exec command, you can even keep
~ RBLSMTPD=.
Andreas
| - Original Message - From: Andreas Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
| Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:32 PM
| Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RBLs
so basicly these are dead hosts because they do not point anywhere. i
think these are part of the qmailtoaster-plus, so it might be a good
idea to take them out.
# dig dnsbl.antispam.or.id
; DiG 9.2.4 dnsbl.antispam.or.id
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY,
Slamp, that's not how dnlsbl's work
DNS Blacklists work by using txt entries.
For example, this ip address attempted to send me mail, but was banned
by spamhaus.
70.103.74.235
So you put the order of the octets in reverse and put the dnsbl
suffix. Then you look for the txt record:
$ host -t
Actually I was slightly wrong. The txt entries are for optional
rejectoin messages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNSBL#DNSBL_Queries
Having an A record causes the rejection.
Erik
On 10/11/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like EE's explaination. Thanks, EE.
Slamp, care to update
