Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-10 Thread Jacob Vickers
> Jacob Vickers wrote: Do you have zombie processes running? Your cpu load is low, yet there are 3 spamd processes running. >>> I thought spamd has 2 standby child-processes and the other one is the >>> master process >>> >> >> Actually spamd will spin off up to 6 child processes to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-10 Thread Brent Gardner
Jacob Vickers wrote: Do you have zombie processes running? Your cpu load is low, yet there are 3 spamd processes running. I thought spamd has 2 standby child-processes and the other one is the master process Actually spamd will spin off up to 6 child processes to handle incoming me

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-10 Thread Jacob Vickers
>> Do you have zombie processes running? Your cpu load is low, yet there >> are 3 spamd processes running. > I thought spamd has 2 standby child-processes and the other one is the > master process >> Actually spamd will spin off up to 6 child processes to handle incoming messages (I believe 6 is

[qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-10 Thread Eric Shubert
PakOgah wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Have you applied Jake's change for the simscan working directory? No I haven't. But will look into You don't need more ram. Your swap file is virtually unused, and there is 1.2G cached i/o. As your processes require more ram, linux will reduce the i/o cach

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-09 Thread PakOgah
Eric Shubert wrote: Have you applied Jake's change for the simscan working directory? No I haven't. But will look into You don't need more ram. Your swap file is virtually unused, and there is 1.2G cached i/o. As your processes require more ram, linux will reduce the i/o cache to accommodate

[qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-08 Thread Eric Shubert
PakOgah wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Because of the way linux uses memory for caching files, it will look as though you don't have much free memory regardless of how much you have (linux uses what you give it, quite smartly). Use of swap is a better indicator of need for more ram, as is a smal

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-07 Thread PakOgah
Eric Shubert wrote: Because of the way linux uses memory for caching files, it will look as though you don't have much free memory regardless of how much you have (linux uses what you give it, quite smartly). Use of swap is a better indicator of need for more ram, as is a small cache size. Us

[qmailtoaster] Re: Memory dan Email stats

2010-02-05 Thread Eric Shubert
PakOgah wrote: Dear List, Can everyone share their - Server Memory Capacity - Top 5 Processes that use memory - and Email statistics? Here mine - My server memory is 2GB and I have only free memory less than 50MB - Top 5 processes that use memory are 1. clamd 200M 2 - 4 spamd each with 80M and