I have an implementation which is using clamav 0.90rc2 and when I
accidentally unpluged the server clamav was complayning of : *
ERROR: Socket file /tmp/clamd exists. Either remove it, or configure a
different one. *
I tried it again and it was the same !
So if you don't have power issues
Greetings,
The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site.
I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a
weeks time.
Thanks,
Erik
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site.
I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a
I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default.
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster,
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default.
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster,
Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by
default.
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Greetings,
I meant safe*
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable?
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL
Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter
spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define
'spambox 1'?
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant safe*
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its
Yes.
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable?
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No.
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter
spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define
'spambox 1'?
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant safe*
On
However, if you use qtp-newmodel with qtp-build-rpms v0.2.3
(qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.3-1.3.5 or later), the --define 'spambox 1'
parameter will be used unconditionally for qmailadmin-toaster, so you should
be sure to upgrade to the latest maildrop-toaster if you upgrade
qmailadmin-toaster using
11 matches
Mail list logo
