Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Bogdan Peptine
Thank you i will try that - Original Message - From: "Helmut Fritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 5:42 AM Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication Yeah - I was thinking hot standby type server...not load balancing. -Original Message

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread P.V.Anthony
Micah Abrams wrote: I have a similar setup using drbd and heartbeat between two toaster boxes. It does not give you any load sharing capability (as its purely an active/passive setup), but does provide you with the redundancy you're looking for. Here too. Currently have two partitions using dr

RE: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Helmut Fritz
Yeah - I was thinking hot standby type server...not load balancing. -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 7:34 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication Rsync could be difficult as it&#

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Eric Shubert
: Micah Abrams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 1:14 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication > > > I have a similar setup using drbd and heartbeat between two toaster boxes. > It does not give you an

RE: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Helmut Fritz
An rsync setup may also work...with heartbeat. -Original Message- From: Micah Abrams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 1:14 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication I have a similar setup using drbd and heartbeat

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Micah Abrams
mailservers is going down the ather one to server his job. >> I want to use only those two server without any ather storage. >> >> Thanks >> >> - Original Message - From: "Eric Shubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Sunday

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Eric Shubert
only those two server without any ather storage. > > Thanks > > - Original Message - From: "Eric Shubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:28 AM > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication > > >> Bogdan Pept

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-06 Thread Bogdan Peptine
t" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 3:28 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication Bogdan Peptine wrote: Hello, I have to servers and i want to have QMT replication so both servers to have the same emails allways. I will have both servers to be registered as mx

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-05 Thread Eric Shubert
Bogdan Peptine wrote: > Hello, > I have to servers and i want to have QMT replication so both servers to > have the same emails allways. > I will have both servers to be registered as mx in the dns zone with > 10/20 priority. > > I can do this with QMT? > > Thanks in advance > This is typica

[qmailtoaster] qmt replication

2008-04-05 Thread Bogdan Peptine
Hello, I have to servers and i want to have QMT replication so both servers to have the same emails allways. I will have both servers to be registered as mx in the dns zone with 10/20 priority. I can do this with QMT? Thanks in advance