t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] smtp hanging up
Thanks for the pointer, George. Nice thing to know!
To be more specific, is that the last one listed by ifconfig? (and what
determines that?)
George Sweetnam wrote:
> One thing to keep
-
> From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] smtp hanging up
>
>
> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>> Sounds like an smtp route is missing in the postfix.
>
> I&
we started having
smtp problems because of it (SPF mainly).
George
- Original Message -
From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] smtp hanging up
Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Sounds like
Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Sounds like an smtp route is missing in the postfix.
I'll buy that, since the /var/log/maillog on the web server says:
Jan 4 21:47:51 hostname postfix/smtp[30371]: connect to
mail.mydomain.com[10.0.1.70]: No route to host (port 25)
(see reply to Jake)
> Your postfix is
>
Jake Vickers wrote:
> Eric "Shubes" wrote:
>> This problem has me stumped at the moment.
>>
>> A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been
>> running
>> fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local
>> web
>> server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix,
Vince Callaway wrote:
> Is your webserver SMTP host set to "localhost" or 127.0.0.1 ?
I'm not sure what you mean. However, when I ping localhost, it resolves to
127.0.0.1 so I think that's ok.
> One of the issues I've run into with the FDR60 installs is that
> localhost is defined with an ipv6 ad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This problem has me stumped at the moment.
>>
>> A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been
>> running
>> fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local web
>> server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix, the message doesn't
Sounds like an smtp route is missing in the postfix. Your postfix is
probably connecting to the outside static ip instead of attempting to
hit 10.0.1.69 directly on the private network.
See if, frm a diff machine, you can hit 10.0.1.69 from the outside ip.
On 1/4/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTEC
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
This problem has me stumped at the moment.
A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been running
fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local web
server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix, the message doesn't go through.
FWIW (d
Is your webserver SMTP host set to "localhost" or 127.0.0.1 ?
One of the issues I've run into with the FDR60 installs is that
localhost is defined with an ipv6 address. Attempting to connect to
localhost will fail.
-
Qmai
> This problem has me stumped at the moment.
>
> A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been
> running
> fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local web
> server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix, the message doesn't go through.
> FWIW (doesn't mak
This problem has me stumped at the moment.
A (relatively) high volume toaster (10.0.1.69) on CentOS4. It's been running
fine for the most part. However, when processing messages from a local web
server (10.0.1.66) relayed from postfix, the message doesn't go through.
FWIW (doesn't make sense to me
12 matches
Mail list logo
