Yes, I'm an old guy, so I know it's been around since the 90s.
But not in as widespread use by "companies" as it is today. Many
companies in the 90s had onsite microsoft mail servers, or
sun/unix/linux mail servers and a lot of the shared hosting was
u
I had the same problem with office/outlook senders.
I had to whitelist a big prefix (40.107.0.0/16) in
/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip file, because I had tried whitelist_senders
before and it wont work.
Regards
Em 22/03/202
On Fri, March 22, 2024 4:40 am, Gary Bowling wrote:
>
>
>
>
> In the spamdyke config, the default is to use spamcop for
> blacklisting. I've had a lot of trouble recently with spamcop. They
> keep adding the outlook.com servers to their database. Which means
> every company that uses
In the spamdyke config, the default is to use spamcop for
blacklisting. I've had a lot of trouble recently with spamcop.
They keep adding the outlook.com servers to their database. Which
means every company that uses Microsoft office 365 for mail gets
b
No worry.
I tried the exact senders address instead the domain but apparently did
not work, I will give a try on @domain and the dnswl.org whitelist.
Em 24/07/2023 10:49, Eric Broch escreveu:
Sorry,
This is what I meant (below). You can use a domain name instead of IP
to white list. If I
Sorry,
This is what I meant (below). You can use a domain name instead of IP to
white list. If I remember correctly and entry would be @somedomain.com.
Whitelisting Senders and Recipients
|recipient-whitelist-entry|
|recipient-whitelist-file|
|sender-whitelist-entry|
Hi Eric,
Here is my spamdyke.conf:
dns-blacklist-entry=b.barracudacentral.org
dns-blacklist-entry=bl.spamcop.net
dns-blacklist-entry=dnsbl.spfbl.net
graylist-dir=/var/spamdyke/graylist
graylist-level=none
graylist-max-secs=2678400
graylist-min-secs=180
greeting-delay-secs=6
header-blacklist-entr
Leonardo,
Did you see the option to block DNS? Or did you try this?
DNS Whitelists
|dns-whitelist-entry|
|dns-whitelist-file|
|rhs-whitelist-entry|
|rhs-whitelist-file|
spamdyke has the ability to consult DNS whitelists and allow connections
from hosts or senders who
Hello there,
My Toaster is blocking a customer domain because they are sending
messages from a Google server that is not allowed in their SPF policy:
Jul 21 10:28:45 app1 spamdyke[24853]: DENIED_OTHER from:
per...@jeduca.org.br to: user@mydomain origin_ip: 209.85.215.172
origin_rdns: mail-pg
So it's the same as for addresses. Ok, I'll give that a try.
Thanks as always!
Gary
On 1/5/2023 3:15 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
I think it would be
@domain1.com
@domain2.com
@domain3.com
Hi this is what I have on mine
more whitelist_rdns
*.jpmio.com
*@etrade.com
@webmain5.rm.ht
—
Ciao,
Remo
> On Thursday, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:15, Eric Broch (mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com)> wrote:
>
> I think it would be
>
> @domain1.com
> @domain2.com
> @domain3.com
>
>
>
>
> On 1/5/2023 12:41 P
I think it would be
@domain1.com
@domain2.com
@domain3.com
On 1/5/2023 12:41 PM, Gary Bowling wrote:
I thought the syntax for whitelisting RDNS via a file was to make a
file with entries as follows:
.domain1.com
.domain2.com
.domain3.com
and that would whitelist anything ending in those
I thought the syntax for whitelisting RDNS via a file was to make
a file with entries as follows:
.domain1.com
.domain2.com
.domain3.com
and that would whitelist anything ending in those. So it would
whitelist and machine whose name is
In my maillog I get messages like this. The user/domain/ip have
been changed, but they are all valid:
spamdyke[10162]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from: fromu...@domain.com
to: tou...@otherdomain.com origin_ip: 162.xxx.sss.yyy origin_rdns:
server.domain.
Thanks, that's what I did. There clearly is something I don't
understand about how denying reverse DNS works.
I whitelisted the IP and not the domain. My logic is. Someone
from anywhere could try to fake the "domain" so whitelisting that
might ex
whitelist it in spamdyke
On 7/16/2021 8:28 AM, Gary Bowling wrote:
I have an issue with mail getting rejected from a specific domain.
It's getting rejected due to Spamdyke and RDNS. Here's the line out of
the log.
Jul 16 09:02:41 vm1 spamdyke[32358]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from:
***@**nd.co
I have an issue with mail getting rejected from a specific
domain. It's getting rejected due to Spamdyke and RDNS. Here's the
line out of the log.
Jul 16 09:02:41 vm1 spamdyke[32358]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from:
***@**nd.com to: ***@**ion.com
Hi Eric,
My Spamassassin config below
ok_locales all
skip_rbl_checks 0
required_hits 5.0
report_safe 0
#rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
use_pyzor 0
ok_languages all
use_auto_whitelist 0
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
use_razor2 0
use_dcc 0
#Spamassassin config
#Spamzen confi
It looks like spamdyke and spamassassin are in place and working. Have
you tried using bayes with spamassassin?
On 5/26/2020 11:17 PM, ChandranManikandan wrote:
Hi Eric,
I have given details below as per your advise.
Incoming Email headers below
*Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 27966, pid:
Hi Eric,
I have given details below as per your advise.
Incoming Email headers below
*Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 27966, pid: 27969, t: 0.4328s
scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.102.2/m:59/d:25824 spam:
3.4.2X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
mail.panasiagroup.n
Do you have the following in your email headers
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 7614, pid: 7616, t: 0.7769s
scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.102.2/m:59/d:25812 spam: 3.4.2
Run commands
# cat /var/log/maillog | grep spamdyke
and
# cat /var/qmail/supervise/smtp/run
To see if spamd
Hi Friends,
Spams emails are continuously hitting my server even i blocked both
spamdyke and spamassasin.
I think spam filter is not working somehow.
Kindly advise do i need to run both or any one.
If suggest which one is powerful and how to remove another spam engine.
Mine is Centos 7 64 bit ser
Yes, upgrade, but look in the clam log as well. I'd be interested to see
if any errors showed up in the clam log...if it were my server. If
upgrade doesn't help looking in the logs could be helpful in determining
the issue.
On 10/27/2016 8:16 PM, Kelly Cobean wrote:
This test worked..with cla
This test worked..with clamav turned off, mail is flowing normally. So you
recommend doing as you suggested earlier regarding upgrading clamav?
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Eric wrote:
> You can turn ClamAV off in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
> just to quickly eliminate, or verify, the pro
You can turn ClamAV off in /var/qmail/control/simcontrol
just to quickly eliminate, or verify, the problem:
From:
:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif
To:
:clam=no,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif
# qmailctl cdb
# qmailctl stop
# qmailctl start
On 10/27/201
I'd also look in /var/log/messages, /var/log/maillog (remember
corresponding times).
You could try updating ClamAV as well, one version at a time, from old
ClamAV versions in this folder:
ftp://ftp.qmailtoaster.com/pub/repo/qmt/CentOS/5/current/x86_64/old/
to the newest stable ClamAV version
I'd look take a look in your clam log. I think
/var/log/qmail/clamav/current??? or something like that. Correspond the
time of qq soft reject... with the time in the clamav log.
On 10/27/2016 7:15 PM, Kelly Cobean wrote:
Don't laugh, but:
CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
[root@www spamdyke]# fre
Don't laugh, but:
CentOS release 5.11 (Final)
[root@www spamdyke]# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Thu Oct 27 21:15:12 2016
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.97.5 Recommended version: 0.99.2
DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq
mai
What system OS and version are you running?
ClamAV?
On 10/27/2016 4:48 PM, Kelly Cobean wrote:
Hey all,
My QMT install has been running for years and admittedly I've done
very little maintenance/patching. I still run a few domains with EZ-MLM
lists and individual accounts and recently, my
Maybe this would be helpful?
http://www.itechlounge.net/2015/12/linux-error-receiving-or-sending-email-wi
th-qmail-451_mail_server_temporarily_rejected_message_4-3-0/
From: Kelly Cobean
Reply-To:
Date: Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 6:48 PM
To:
Subject: [qmailtoaster] spamdyke rejecting
Hey all,
My QMT install has been running for years and admittedly I've done very
little maintenance/patching. I still run a few domains with EZ-MLM lists
and individual accounts and recently, my server stopped accepting all
inbound messages. There are only 2 messages in my queue and I've stop
Tony,
CentOS 5 x86_64 RPM:
ftp://ftp.whitehorsetc.com/pub/repo/qmt/CentOS/5/testing/x86_64/spamdyke-5.0.1-0.qt.el5.x86_64.rpm
Remember to backup spamdyke.conf beforehand and run the script fixsd.sh
(below) at CLI for spamdyke.conf after upgrade.
#!/bin/sh
sed -i \
-e 's/reject-missing-sender
Hi Eirc,
Thank you I use x86_64.
best wishes
Tony White
Yea Computing Services
http://www.ycs.com.au
4 The Crescent
Yea
Victoria
Australia 3717
Telephone No's
VIC : 03 9008 5614
FAX : 03 9008 5610 (FAX2Email)
Be aware: All calls to and from YCS landlines and mobiles are recorded
IMPORTANT
Change the below script and use the full path to spamdyke.conf
Change on the last line:
'spamdyke.conf'
to
'/etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf
EricB
On 3/6/2016 10:22 PM, Eric wrote:
#!/bin/sh
sed -i \
-e 's/reject-missing-sender-mx/reject-sender=no-mx/g' \
-e 's/rejection-text-missing-sender-mx/re
ritz wrote:
Thx Eric. The below helps a lot. Is there a recommended method?
Remove and install anew or upgrade?
-Original Message-
From: Eric [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 2:49 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spamdyke 5.0
Tony,
I had to take down my CentOS 5 vm for other purposes, so I'll get it up
and running tomorrow and have those spamdyke rpms in the tree for you
then. i386 or x86_64?
EricB
On 3/6/2016 9:56 PM, Tony White wrote:
Hi Eric,
Looks good except I am still on CentOS5.
How do I add your repo
rom: Eric [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 2:49 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spamdyke 5.0.1-0 CentOS 6/7 x86_64
Helmut,
Eventually it will be in general release unless you want it there sooner, it is
in the testing tree presently (pe
Hi Eric,
Looks good except I am still on CentOS5.
How do I add your repo to my repos please?
best wishes
Tony White
On 7/03/2016 06:09, Eric wrote:
I was a bit hasty in my creation of the rpm's as the old spamdyke.conf file should be replaced. I'll get on that and have
the rpms up by end
Thx Eric. The below helps a lot. Is there a recommended method? Remove and
install anew or upgrade?
-Original Message-
From: Eric [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 2:49 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spamdyke 5.0.1-0
Helmut Fritz wrote:
Will this get rolled into the general rpms/release?
-Original Message-
From: Eric [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 11:10 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spamdyke 5.0.1-0 CentOS 6/7 x86_64
I was a bit hasty in my cr
Will this get rolled into the general rpms/release?
-Original Message-
From: Eric [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 11:10 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spamdyke 5.0.1-0 CentOS 6/7 x86_64
I was a bit hasty in my creation
I was a bit hasty in my creation of the rpm's as the old spamdyke.conf
file should be replaced. I'll get on that and have the rpms up by end of
day.
On 3/6/2016 9:55 AM, Eric wrote:
Be mindful that some of the setting in the old spamdyke.conf will mess
with mail delivery.
I had to comment out
Be mindful that some of the setting in the old spamdyke.conf will mess
with mail delivery.
I had to comment out 2 lines
#local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
#reject-missing-sender-mx
Eric
On 3/6/2016 9:32 AM, Eric wrote:
CentOS 6:
rpm -Uvh
ftp://ftp.whitehorsetc.com/pub/repo/qmt/
CentOS 6:
rpm -Uvh
ftp://ftp.whitehorsetc.com/pub/repo/qmt/CentOS/6/testing/x86_64/spamdyke-5.0.1-0.qt.el6.x86_64.rpm
or
# yum --enablerepo=whtc-qmt-testing update
If you have White Horse repos in your yum configuration.
CentOS7:
rpm -Uvh
ftp://ftp.whitehorsetc.com/pub/repo/qmt/CentOS/7/testin
Hi Eric,
Thank you for that I appreciate your effort...
The latest version is 5 and has a couple of nice benefits.
best wishes
Tony White
Yea Computing Services
http://www.ycs.com.au
4 The Crescent
Yea
Victoria
Australia 3717
Telephone No's
VIC : 03 9008 5614
FAX : 03 9008 5610 (FAX2Email)
Hi Tony,
I would think so as it sits in front of qmail and shouldn't affect it.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'll download the latest sources and roll an rpm. I should have done
this a while ago.
EricB.
On 3/6/2016 12:27 AM, Tony White wrote:
Hi folks,
Can I just download the
Hi folks,
Can I just download the latest spamdyke and install it?
There is no update for my QMT.
--
best wishes
Tony White
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-
that's how i do it right now :) ,
thank's
rgds
Ridwanfi
On 09/02/2015 12:15, Eric Broch wrote:
You could go over to mxtoolbox.com and punch in the blacklisted domain
and run a blacklist check. This could possibly reveal the BL reporter.
On 2/8/2015 8:36 PM, Ridwan Firmansyah wrote:
one of
You could go over to mxtoolbox.com and punch in the blacklisted domain
and run a blacklist check. This could possibly reveal the BL reporter.
On 2/8/2015 8:36 PM, Ridwan Firmansyah wrote:
> one of my server with spamdyke installed, did'not show reason what
> caused incoming connection being Blocke
one of my server with spamdyke installed, did'not show reason what
caused incoming connection being Blocked.
for example, below is right log that i need. it's show that mail blocked
by bl.spamcop.net
spamdyke[21054]: DENIED_RBL_MATCH from: misa...@bebidaseafins.com.br to:
m...@x.xxx origin
Hi Eric.
Am I correct that Spamdyke-stats-report.pl needs to be altered to read
the mighty maillog log file now in order to compile other than 0's in
the report ? ;-)
Cheers
Finn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsub
Hi Eric.
Maybe You should put in a litle remark that users who uses fail2ban
(like me ;-)) may have to make some changes to their jail.conf file,
due to the changes of logging ?
Cheers and thanks for all Your work to make QMT what it is.
Finn
Den 10-07-2014 00:22, Eric Shubert skrev:
> In the
Hi Eric.
Maybe You should put in a litle remark that users who uses fail2ban
(like me ;-)) may have to make some changes to their jail.conf file,
due to the changes of logging ?
Cheers and thanks for all Your work to make QMT what it is.
Finn
Den 10-07-2014 00:22, Eric Shubert skrev:
> In the
Hi Eric.
Maybe You should put in a litle remark that users who uses fail2ban
(like me ;-)) may have to make some changes to their jail.conf file,
due to the changes of logging ?
Cheers and thanks for all Your work to make QMT what it is.
Finn
Den 10-07-2014 00:22, Eric Shubert skrev:
> In the
In the next release of spamdyke, the configuration will be such that log
messages will go to syslog (/var/log/maillog).
The release for this change is in the testing repo, but it requires a
manual change to the spamdyke.conf file even with an updated package.
So in preparation for this, you c
Hello list,
I am getting the following error when a local QMT user tries to send an
email to a remote hotmail account. Can anyone tell me why I would be
getting such a message in the SMTP log?
spamdyke[28592]: DENIED_OTHER from: myu...@mydomain.org to:
remoteaddr...@hotmail.com origin_ip: some.l
Hello,
Anyone got an idea why not the spamdyke not stopping any incoming
connection and backscatter emailing?
10-14 15:55:05 tcpserver: status: 1/100
10-14 15:55:09 CHKUSER accepted sender: from
remote
rcpt <> : sender accepted
10-14 15:55:09 CHKUSER relaying rcpt: from
remote
rcpt : cl
Greetings all:
I have a large mailserver that just today decided that all messages with
attachments are infected with MBL_349876.UNOFFICIAL
I have temporarily bypassed SpamDyke processing on outbound mail, but
would prefer to put it back in.
Has anyone else run into this? If so, how did you
Hi,
I've insalled and configured SpamDyke recently, but it is not working on
relayed messages. (/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp is as below)
xx.xx.xx.xx:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",SENDER_NOCHECK="1",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan",NOP0FCHECK="1"
shall I configure anything else? (Like Spamassassin).
Hi,
I just use this qmail toaster server as mail server relay from a few known
hosts, I just need sender/recipient blacklist feature and content filtering
(header-blacklist-entry) for now, but it still does not work. Could you please
take a look at the following configuration and help me in tro
Hi folks,
I have an issue that I thought I had fixed for a customer.
An email is sent from one of his software providers and
makes it all the way to SIMSCAN which rejects is with a
hard reject.
No problem I thought, I will whitelist_sender that address
but nope it still gets simscan rejected.
Happy New year everyone!
I hope you guys can help me fix this issue. I am not familiar with
spamdyke but I followed the installation a few months ago. But there is
a problem with one of our client domain and from the SMTP logs it says
below:
@400050ef9f7c00b45604 spamdyke[14586]: DENIED_
On 12/19/2012 10:21 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
thank for you replay,
my version spamdyke is :
spamdyke 3.1.8+TLS
not support
log-level=verbose
log-target=stderr
please help me
thanks
You should probably upgrade Spamdyke. Version 4.3.1 is available.
Brent Gardner
---
thank for you replay,
my version spamdyke is :
spamdyke 3.1.8+TLS
not support
log-level=verbose
log-target=stderr
please help me
thanks
2012/12/19 Brent Gardner :
> On 12/19/2012 12:56 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> thanks for you replay.
>>
>> @400050d172131ddcbcbc tcpserver:
On 12/19/2012 12:56 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
Hello,
thanks for you replay.
@400050d172131ddcbcbc tcpserver: ok 8032
mail.server.it:192.168.xx.xx:25 :176.28.51.172::44551
@400050d17214148dbddc tcpserver: status: 26/100
@400050d17214148dc5ac tcpserver: pid 8033 from 88.135.xx.xx
@4000
Hello,
thanks for you replay.
@400050d172131ddcbcbc tcpserver: ok 8032
mail.server.it:192.168.xx.xx:25 :176.28.51.172::44551
@400050d17214148dbddc tcpserver: status: 26/100
@400050d17214148dc5ac tcpserver: pid 8033 from 88.135.xx.xx
@400050d17214148dc5ac tcpserver: ok 8033
mail.ser
On 12/17/2012 06:43 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
Hi all,
I enabled statistics according to these directions,
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spamdyke#Statistics
but when I run the command "cat / var / log / qmail / smtp / current
| / usr / share / QMT / scripts / spamdyke-stats" I get this
Hi all,
I enabled statistics according to these directions,
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spamdyke#Statistics
but when I run the command "cat / var / log / qmail / smtp / current
| / usr / share / QMT / scripts / spamdyke-stats" I get this error:
cat /var/log/qmail/smtp/current | /usr/
Hi all,
I'm not sure spamdyke greylist is operating correctly.
I log in qmail / smtp / current do not see "DENIED_GRAYLISTED from:"
what should I check?
perhaps the log level is too low?
This is my spamdyke.conf
#dns-blacklist-entry=zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net
#dns-blacklist-entry=dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
Dnia 2012-11-27, wto o godzinie 16:18 +0100, Alessio Cecchi pisze:
> Remove bl.spamcop.net, many italian ISP (Libero, Fastweb,
> TelecomItalia)
> are often in this list.
Don't do it. It's not the problem to remove from this list a proper
configured mail server.
You can add:
rhs-blacklist-entry=d
Thanks Alessio,
my problem is this many italian ISP (Libero, Fastweb, TelecomItalia) are
often in this list.
What are your dns-blacklist-entry?
you're just using zen.spamhaus.org?
thanks
2012/11/27 Alessio Cecchi :
> Il 27/11/2012 15:07, Giuseppe Perna ha scritto:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I would like to
Il 27/11/2012 15:07, Giuseppe Perna ha scritto:
Hi all,
I would like to decrease the sensitivity and spam filter because, in
my opinion, it blocks too much email.
You think about what parameters I need to change?
Below the configuration of spamdyke,
the reports of blocked email
configure spamassa
Hi all,
I would like to decrease the sensitivity and spam filter because, in
my opinion, it blocks too much email.
You think about what parameters I need to change?
Below the configuration of spamdyke,
the reports of blocked email
configure spamassassin
thanks
spamdyke.conf
#dns-blacklist-entr
On 11/18/2012 02:16 AM, Giuseppe Perna wrote:
Good morning to all,
I read a lot of documentation on spamdyke and spamassassin but I did
not understand a few things:
I'll post my understanding which is by no means gospel.
1) I have installed on my system (qnmailtoaster up date ) spamdyke
from
Good morning to all,
I read a lot of documentation on spamdyke and spamassassin but I did
not understand a few things:
1) I have installed on my system (qnmailtoaster up date ) spamdyke
from this time spamassassin is uninstalled or work together?
2) spamdyke merely accept or reject, if a message
Sorry typo:
it is /var/qmail/ and I reset to 777 to test
And Maildirs are:
drwx-- 9 vpopmail vchkpw
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Postmaster <
postmas...@seawise-chartering.co.uk> wrote:
> Are you sure this is the correct queue folder?
>
> Normally queue is in /var/qmail with t
The permission in /var/qmail/queue look alright to me
Check /var/qmail/bin/ permissions:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Apr 1 20:22 qmail-queue ->qmail-queue.orig
-rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 24776 Mar 29 10:19 qmail-queue.orig
Check the user/group id problem please.
Vpopmail ->89
vchkuser -> 89
Are you sure this is the correct queue folder?
Normally queue is in /var/qmail with the following permissions:
drwxr-x--- 11 qmailq qmail 4096 Apr 22 2012 queue
By the way, the maildir is:
-rw--- 1 vpopmail vchkpw
On 29/10/2012 20:55, Dave MacDonald wrote:
See permission in var queue an
See permission in var queue and user maildir
/var/queue 777 qmail:qmails
Maildir 700 vchkpw:vpopmail 700
Thanks
See permission in var queue and user maildir.
Dave MacDonald escreveu:
>@4000508eda9f3977dc54 tcpserver: end 5233 status 0
>@4000508eda9f3977e424 tcpserver: status: 10/100
>@4000508edaa01b6a5d2c tcpserver: end 5253 status 0
>@4000508edaa01b6a9f94 tcpserver: status: 9/100
>@40
@4000508eda9f3977dc54 tcpserver: end 5233 status 0
@4000508eda9f3977e424 tcpserver: status: 10/100
@4000508edaa01b6a5d2c tcpserver: end 5253 status 0
@4000508edaa01b6a9f94 tcpserver: status: 9/100
@4000508edaa01db73f14 qmail-dk:[5239]: Dying due to write operation
error (disk fu
Copy and paste these errors for us
Dave MacDonald escreveu:
>smtp logs show lots of " qq write error or disk full" Dying due to write
>operation error (disk full?).
>but df -h show 134Gb free
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Kalil Costa wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>>
>> troubleshootingsee
Please post /var/qmail/queue permissions here
On 29/10/2012 20:24, Dave MacDonald wrote:
Also client getting error 451 qq trouble creating files in queue (
#4.3.0 )
this is gonna cost me my job,
anyone do email hosting?
>
> Also client getting error 451 qq trouble creating files in queue ( #4.3.0 )
>
smtp logs show lots of " qq write error or disk full" Dying due to write
operation error (disk full?).
but df -h show 134Gb free
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Kalil Costa wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
> troubleshootingsee the logs os SMTP , antispam and clamavsometimes
> spamassassin may have a
Hey,
troubleshootingsee the logs os SMTP , antispam and clamavsometimes
spamassassin may have a problem and lock the queue.
Check your DNS too
"Cecil Yother, Jr." escreveu:
>On 10/29/2012 11:19 AM, Dave MacDonald wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply.
>>
>> My problem is now my mail que
Okay, now remote mail staying at 88, but not going out,
firewall is down .
qmHandle -l
Messages in local queue: 0
Messages in remote queue: 88
Thanks
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Dave MacDonald wrote:
> Standard as setup with qmail iso, will drop firewall to test, and
> restarted queue
>
>
Standard as setup with qmail iso, will drop firewall to test, and restarted
queue
am I doing the correct command to restart queue?
qmHandle -a
Thanks all
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 11:19 AM, Dave MacDonald wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
>
Dnia 2012-10-29, pon o godzinie 10:38 -0700, Dave MacDonald pisze:
> for testing, how do I disable spamdyke?
Go to the directory: /var/qmail/supervise/smtp
and change the symbolic link run from run.spamdyke to run.dist.
--
Pozdrawiam/Regards,
mgr inż. Aleksander Podsiadły
st. informatyk gminy
Urz
On 10/29/2012 11:19 AM, Dave MacDonald
wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
My problem is now my mail queue willnot send,
remote queue currently 88 an going up
tried qmHandle -a
waited a bit, the qmHandle -l, still more not goin
Thanks for the reply.
My problem is now my mail queue willnot send,
remote queue currently 88 an going up
tried qmHandle -a
waited a bit, the qmHandle -l, still more not going out.
This is a complete rebuild, using Centos ISO, all yum and qtp-menu updates,
re-added all domains and users, tested
On 10/29/2012 12:38 PM, Dave MacDonald wrote:
Hi List
for testing, how do I disable spamdyke?
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Spamdyke
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additio
Dnia 2012-08-25, sob o godzinie 19:11 +0200, Aleksander Podsiadły pisze:
> ln -s run.spamdyke run.spamdyke
My mistake:
ln -s run.spamdyke run
sorry!
--
Pozdrawiam/Regards,
mgr inż. Aleksander Podsiadły
st. informatyk gminy
Urząd Gminy w Mniowie
ul. Centralna 9
26-080 Mniów
tel: +48 413737002
fax
Dnia 2012-08-26, nie o godzinie 02:24 +1000, Tony White pisze:
> This happened after the last update using qtp-newmodel.
8<--
cd /var/qmail/supervise/smtp
rm run
ln -s run.spamdyke run.spamdyke
service qmail restart
8<-- EOT
--
Pozdrawiam/Regards,
mgr inż. Aleksander Podsiadły
st. informatyk gmi
Hi folks,
Sorry about this, I am sure we discussed this issue before but I am unable to
find out how to fix it again.
[root@myserver scripts]# cat /var/log/qmail/smtp/current | ./spamdyke-stats
Summary
Allowed:00.00%
Timeout:00.00%
Erro
Dear all, I set up a filter only qmailtoaster server to put in front of an
exchange server (sigh) following the Jake's video on youtube. Now my situation
is the following
I ofcourse enabled spamdyke.
I have an hylafax server in internal network that want to send notification at
the internal ex
Is the blacklisting function used by spamdyke & spamassassin case
sensitive? For example, would blacklisting j...@domain.com effectively
blacklist j...@domain.com as well?
Thanks,
--
Casey Price
Smile Global Technical Support
Submit or check trouble tickets http://billing.smileglobal.com
www.
On 03/06/2012 08:25 PM, Tony White wrote:
Hello again,
Thanks to Eric and to Brent but neither seem to be the issue.
I have updated spamdyke and check the script at the command
line and still only gets zeros for results! Also no errors reported at
the command line.
Do you run the script as root
Hello again,
Thanks to Eric and to Brent but neither seem to be the issue.
I have updated spamdyke and check the script at the command
line and still only gets zeros for results! Also no errors reported at
the command line.
I have noticed getting more spam through since the update though!
bes
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo