Hi All,
M not able to receive mails from @hdfcbank.com. When I checked the smtp
logs, I got following spf-reject log.
01-13 10:50:22 qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(relay5.hdfcbank.com) from
192.168.2.1. MAILFROM:xxx@hdfcbank.com.
I have changed the spf Behavior from 3 to 0. But I dont w
Thanks, Dave. These aren't what I'm trying to remember though.
Some time ago (could be 2 years or so) I backed off my spfbehavior from
3 to 1 due to some sort of problem with SPF checking. Might have been
when SPF rejections weren't logged.
I'll just bump it (back) up to 3 and see what happen
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Jake, I'm of the opinion that there's an (intermittent) bug in the
SPF patch. I believe I was running at '3' a long time back, but have
been running '1' for some time now.
Does anyone recall what the problem with SPF checking was? Will
someone check the list archives
Eric,
I spent a little time looking through archives for an issue with SPF
checking. There was an issue related to SPF and Blackberries in 2006.
See this post
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg07438.html
. also found this one re: blackbery
http://www.mail-archi
Sollunga S wrote:
Hi
recently i started gettng the following message, can anyone help me please,
qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(smtp06.bis.eu.blackberry.com) from
67.223.93.102. MAILFROM:SRS0=RPyuk9=AE=
I presume this a legitimate message?
I see no SPF record for blackberry.com, so I'm gu
Hi
recently i started gettng the following message, can anyone help me please,
qmail-smtpd: spf-reject: HELO(smtp06.bis.eu.blackberry.com) from 67.223.93.102.
MAILFROM:SRS0=RPyuk9=AE=
ubject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
Okay, thanks for the response!
The following is the contents of my named.conf file. I really don't see
anything with my domain name (velocity-med.com) (see below):. I guess that
means that I am not the master, which is fine as I will just have to conta
*
I will contact my host provider and ask them to fill in the spf info which
after using the online tool looks like below:
v=spf1 a mx ~all
If anything is glowingly wrong please let me know.
Francisco "Paco" Peralta
- Original Message
From: Tim Mancour <[EMA
ECTED]>
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:17:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
>
> You should do It in the DNS Server that has your domain zone (master).
> Probably your own DNS Server (or is it just a cache server?)
>
>
plains SPF, the
> syntax and even has a wizard to generate SPF records.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> From: Francisco Paco Peralta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 9:52 AM
>
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
ctober 11, 2007 9:52 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
Just to clarify. This exercise started out with a person emailing me and
their email not getting through my server because of their spf settings, but
when I checked my own settings it seems I
From: aledr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:17:21 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
You should do It in the DNS Server that has your domain zone (master).
Probably your own DNS Server (or is it just a cache server?
: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11:15:19 AM
> Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
>
>
> The following site allows you to test their SPF record against the Email's
> domain - http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/spf/
> The server'
ROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11:15:19 AM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
The following site allows you to test their SPF record
against the Email's domain - http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/spf/
The server's address pas
Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:48 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spf-reject
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Hello List,
A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected by my
server. I took a look at the smtp logs and found the followi
The owner of publix.com doesn't want users sending mail that didn't go
through their mail servers, according to the way the MX record is
written.
This user is attempting to talk directly to your mail server and thus
getting rejected, as per the publix.com policy.
"v=spf1 mx a:mail.publix.com mx:m
Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
Hello List,
A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected
by my server. I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following
(I have changed the email address to x's to protect the innocent):
*
10-09
Hello List,
A customer recently informed me that his emails were getting rejected by my
server. I took a look at the smtp logs and found the following (I have changed
the email address to x's to protect the innocent):
*
10-09 15:59:23 tcpserver: status: 1/10
18 matches
Mail list logo
