Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2008-06-16 Thread Jake Vickers
Shai wrote: Hi, How would I actually be able to retrieve an email that was suspected as spam and copy it into my mailbox? Is there a spam mailbox or trash bin? If you have the "Spam detection" box checked, then it may show up in the "Spam" folder in webmail. Otherwise simscan will have del

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2008-06-16 Thread Shai
Hi, How would I actually be able to retrieve an email that was suspected as spam and copy it into my mailbox? Is there a spam mailbox or trash bin? Shai On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Starkie wrote: > > Hi All > > > > I am trying to find a mai

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2008-03-05 Thread Adam Cantwell
On 03/05/2008 12:34 PM, Richard Starkie wrote: I am trying to find a mail that I suspect may have been declared spam by my SpamAssasin, I have looked in the logs, however they appear to be a little light on content, can someone please confirm where I should be looking, and if the messages ar

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2008-03-05 Thread Eric Shubert
Richard Starkie wrote: > Hi All > > I am trying to find a mail that I suspect may have been declared spam by > my SpamAssasin, I have looked in the logs, however they appear to be a > little light on content, can someone please confirm where I should be > looking, and if the messages are stored s

Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL

2006-10-27 Thread Erik Espinoza
?? On 10/27/06, Tobias Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3? No im running a Fedora Core 5 install. Tobias Braun - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted -

AW: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL

2006-10-27 Thread Tobias Braun
> You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3? No im running a Fedora Core 5 install. Tobias Braun - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted ---

Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL

2006-10-26 Thread Erik Espinoza
# rpm -e perl-Net-DNS On 10/26/06, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: remove On 10/26/06, Steve Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: > > > Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3. > > removing, or upgrading to the latest

Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL

2006-10-26 Thread Erik Espinoza
remove On 10/26/06, Steve Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: > Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3. removing, or upgrading to the latest version? -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an im

Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL

2006-10-26 Thread Steve Huff
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3. removing, or upgrading to the latest version? -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v

Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL

2006-10-26 Thread Erik Espinoza
Try removing the perl-Net-DNS rpm that ships with CentOS 3. Erik On 10/26/06, Steve Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: > You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3? hm - i see a similar problem, and i am running CentOS 3. is this a known bug?

Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL

2006-10-26 Thread Steve Huff
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Erik Espinoza wrote: You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3? hm - i see a similar problem, and i am running CentOS 3. is this a known bug? is there a fix? -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - F

[qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Re: [qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Problems with URIDNSBL / SURBL

2006-10-26 Thread Erik Espinoza
You wouldn't happen to be running CentOS 3? On 10/26/06, Tobias Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! I just installed a fresh Qmailtoaster with the newest patches and found out that URIDNSBL aren't working. I've added "loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL" in "/etc/mail/spam

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
> Will just using SURBLs help since I can control it with simscan. > > -Original Message- > From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:47 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam p

RE: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Alex
Will just using SURBLs help since I can control it with simscan. -Original Message- From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:47 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems RBLs are used directly fro

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
--Original Message- > From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:22 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems > > Alex wrote: >> I am getting tons of spam to my users that

RE: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Brig C. McCoy
e. Tweaking the rules > etc.. > > -Original Message- > From: Brig C. McCoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:23 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems > > For what it's

RE: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Alex
Are RBLs and SURBL controlled through simscan? I have spamassasin and clamav turned off for some domains. Alex -Original Message- From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:22 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoa

RE: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Alex
.. -Original Message- From: Brig C. McCoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 12:23 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems For what it's worth, we ended up moving from a combination of SpamAssassin and local client spam filters to PO

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Brig C. McCoy
For what it's worth, we ended up moving from a combination of SpamAssassin and local client spam filters to POSTINI... it kind of annoys me to have to use a commercial service, but the amount of spam we receive now is truly trivial and I saw three false positives in the first month (out of about 15

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Alex wrote: > I am getting tons of spam to my users that passes through the default > spam assassin and clam qmailtoaster implementation. Can someone share > their tactics in adding more spam protection to the server? Like > addition spam blocklists, rules etc.. > > Much appreciated > Go to http

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spam problems

2006-10-13 Thread Igor Smitran
Alex wrote: I am getting tons of spam to my users that passes through the default spam assassin and clam qmailtoaster implementation. Can someone share their tactics in adding more spam protection to the server? Like addition spam blocklists, rules etc.. Much appreciated Did you try anything f