+1
Nginx does have a minor drawback: Monitoring it with stock modules included in
most setups is horrid. You have no upstream status information (which nodes
failed, why did they fail, how long etc) nor any serious graphable information.
It's been an issue at work for is for a while and has led
Personally I would prefer to stick with Apache or (ideally) to make the package
work with both depending on which one is available. Nginx is great, but most
shops I work with use Apache and know it well. It works and they don't want to
switch.
-Erik
Fro
On May 28, 2014, at 3:17 AM, Erik Wramner wrote:
> Personally I would prefer to stick with Apache or (ideally) to make the
> package work with both depending on which one is available. Nginx is great,
> but most shops I work with use Apache and know it well. It works and they
> don't want to s
