Thanks for the update and patch. I've installed them and also set
DKDEBUG.
I looked through qmail-dk code (and did searches) but I don't seem to be
able to find where to control the scope of my outgoing signatures. Is
that something that is just not implemented yet?
---
That should have read srs patch.
On 12/30/06, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex,
I am looking to integrate your patch into the next "qmail-toaster"
package, along with the spf one.
It's coming people. :)
Thanks,
Erik
On 12/30/06, Alexey Loukianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gree
Alex,
I am looking to integrate your patch into the next "qmail-toaster"
package, along with the spf one.
It's coming people. :)
Thanks,
Erik
On 12/30/06, Alexey Loukianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings, Vince.
On 29 декабря 2006 г., 20:54:54 you wrote:
> I made the change.
> One thi
Greetings, Vince.
On 29 декабря 2006 г., 20:54:54 you wrote:
> I made the change.
> One thing I have noticed is bad signatures on messages relayed through
> lists. I think it is actually a bug on the sending end.
> The DomainKey-Signature indicates "c=nofws" but does not contain an "h="
> entr
