Good news, everyone! :-)
The best qooxdoo ever has just been released. It is (again) a major step
forward in the ongoing process of providing one of the most
comprehensive and innovative JavaScript frameworks on this planet. We
are not sure about the frameworks in other solar systems, though.
Yep, I noticed that the button was broken on Tuesday's svn checkout. I've
got the same problem.
dperez wrote:
>
> http://demo.qooxdoo.org/html/example/Table_1.html
>
> The button at the right to toggle the visibility of columns does nothing.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
Thanks for the info,
I added the following code:
***
window.auto();
window.addEventListener("appear", function(e) {
window.centerToBrowser();
});
window.open();
***
Here "window" is a previously created
"qx.ui.window.Window".
The code works, but initially the window appears
visible
Sebastian,
do you have an idea, what may be the reason for this kind of behavior?
I really need this in my app. since a user should have a possibility to
do all the stuff with the keyboard. And it looks like a bug for me.
Probably you do have an idea for a workaround.
Thanks in advance,
alex.d
Another alternative is to use the skeletons as a starting base for your
application. The included Makefiles automatically reduce qooxdoo to the
required parts needed by your application.
Please take a look here:
http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/user_manual/skeleton
Cheers,
Sebastian
Jose Leo
Jose Leon schrieb:
> Hello,
> On 9/7/06, dperez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The build system works ok. Dependencies are handled automatically.
> Thanks for replying.
>
> The problem I have is that I don't want to include a 900Kb .js file on
> a page that has a single button, so I don't want to
Hello,
On 9/7/06, dperez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The build system works ok. Dependencies are handled automatically.
Thanks for replying.
The problem I have is that I don't want to include a 900Kb .js file on
a page that has a single button, so I don't want to use the build
system, and the al
Hola Jose,
The build system works ok. Dependencies are handled automatically.
Jose Leon wrote:
>
> Hello,
> On 9/7/06, dperez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> and have saved a little more bytes in qx.js.
> I'm creating PHP classes to allow me use the components from PHP with
> ease, I have read
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/html/example/Table_1.html
The button at the right to toggle the visibility of columns does nothing.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Feature-not-working-in-table-demo-tf2232828.html#a6189259
Sent from the qooxdoo-devel forum at Nabble.com.
---
Why not just use one of the skeletons? The skeletons should be the
preferred way to start a new qooxdoo application with 0.6. Please take a
look to our documentation:
http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/user_manual/skeleton
Cheers,
Sebastian
F. Kieling @ COVI schrieb:
> Ok. It's correct. I've
Ok. It's correct. I've moved the qx.js in my favored directory and it's run.
Can I moved the resources (images, ...) to an other place? And how can I
do this?
dperez wrote:
> qooxdoo is compiled into just one script named qx.js, which you can copy
> wherever you like.
> Read the doc first.
>
>
>
Hello,
On 9/7/06, dperez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and have saved a little more bytes in qx.js.
I'm creating PHP classes to allow me use the components from PHP with
ease, I have read the manual sections about the build system and the
source version and what I want to do it's to include just th
qooxdoo is compiled into just one script named qx.js, which you can copy
wherever you like.
Read the doc first.
F. Kieling @ COVI wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I mean the location vor javascript-files (e.g. /data/javascript/qooxdoo)
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/own-direct
Hi,
I mean the location vor javascript-files (e.g. /data/javascript/qooxdoo)
> Hi,
>
> I you talking about locating resources (images, ...)?
>
>
> F. Kieling @ COVI wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've testing the rc1 from qooxdoo. I think, it's very interesting for me
>> and
>> my projects.
>> I wou
Hi,
I you talking about locating resources (images, ...)?
F. Kieling @ COVI wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've testing the rc1 from qooxdoo. I think, it's very interesting for me
> and
> my projects.
> I would save the qooxdoo-files in my own directory-structure. But how can
> I do this?
>
> Best Re
Hi,
I would like to share some tricks I use for using the table widget.
I use a qx.ui.table.Table for editing data.
As direct editing doesn't work for non TextField widgets, I use a separate
editing panel.
For my needs, focused row must be equivalent to selected row (single
selection).
var s
Hello,
I've testing the rc1 from qooxdoo. I think, it's very interesting for me and
my projects.
I would save the qooxdoo-files in my own directory-structure. But how can
I do this?
Best Regards,
Florian
--
common visions media.agentur
mönchstr. 6|7
18439 stralsund
phone 0049 [0] 38 31 . 30 31
Oh!
sorry, i thought window is qooxdoo-window and setTimeout is it's
method. Now it's clear.
BUT it doesnt' work too...
:'(
alex.d
This is a standard function, present in any modern browser.
alex.d wrote:
Anyway:
win1.setTimeout is not a function
what revision do you use?
This is a standard function, present in any modern browser.
alex.d wrote:
>
> Anyway:
> win1.setTimeout is not a function
> what revision do you use?
>> Sorry, I meant window.setTimeout(function() { liste.focus() }, 1);
>>
>>
>> dperez wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I meant window.setTimer(functio
Title: AW: [qooxdoo-devel] Serialization/Ajax/Storage
Hi all,
qx.io.Json.stringify is a really useful function especially if you want to print the contents of objects for debugging. I've used dojo.io.serialize extensively for debugging in a dojo project of mine.
I think this function should
Anyway:
win1.setTimeout is not a function
what revision do you use?
Sorry, I meant window.setTimeout(function() { liste.focus() }, 1);
dperez wrote:
Sorry, I meant window.setTimer(function() { liste.focus() }, 1);
alex.d wrote:
Hi dperez,
window has no such
Sorry, I meant window.setTimeout(function() { liste.focus() }, 1);
dperez wrote:
>
> Sorry, I meant window.setTimer(function() { liste.focus() }, 1);
>
>
> alex.d wrote:
>>
>> Hi dperez,
>> window has no such method "setInterval", but if i do understand it -
>> your idea was to set a timer
Sorry, I meant window.setTimer(function() { liste.focus() }, 1);
alex.d wrote:
>
> Hi dperez,
> window has no such method "setInterval", but if i do understand it -
> your idea was to set a timer that focuses the list every millisecond?
> smth. like this:
>
>
Hi dperez,
window has no such method "setInterval", but if i do understand it -
your idea was to set a timer that focuses the list every millisecond?
smth. like this:
timer = new qx.client.Timer(1);
timer.addEventListener(qx.constant.Event.INTERVAL, func
24 matches
Mail list logo
