Our main frame class is used as a common point for implementation of
singleton functionality, e.g. managing context menus. Typically there are
some members and a few functions for each case.
I don't want to define singletons classes for each block of functionality.
One reason for that is that othe
> as far as I recognize, something like this
>
> //...
> setColumns(["First name", "Middle name", "Last name"],
> [0, 1, 2]);
> //...
> // Data "example"
> data = [ {"foo", "bar", "baz"},
>{"Foo!","BAR!", "zoo"}, ...];
Neat trick, but presumably you meant:
da
On 10/5/07, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been playing with trying to get a cross domain request to work for
a
> few hours now with no success. I created a request, and loaded a local
file
> and it does what I want it to do. But as soon as I change the URL to a
> remote location an
I have been playing with trying to get a cross domain request to work for a
few hours now with no success. I created a request, and loaded a local file
and it does what I want it to do. But as soon as I change the URL to a
remote location and set the CrossDomain to true, I always get:
ERROR: qx.io
On 10/4/07, westor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not shure if this is a bug in build optimization:
> Sometimes I use an array like an object.
> var result = new Array();
> var result.ACL = new Array();
> Often I access the properties (or lets say, the keys) in this way:
> alert(result.ACL.prop
Hm,
looks like no one has an answer for this? ;-)
I think I have to avoid such mixed access methods in future, but is this a
bug in build or or isn't it?
Cheers
Torsten
westor wrote:
>
> I'm not shure if this is a bug in build optimization:
> Sometimes I use an array like an object.
> var re
Hello everybody (the 2nd time),
also the second issue I'm struggling with concerns the table. What I need is a
behaviour like we all know it from a table in HTML: the row get its height from
the height of the highest cell within the row. In our application the length of
the cell content is very
Hello everybody (the 1st time),
currently I'm trying to select one specific row of a table. The row has a
column that contains an unique identifier. No the issue: how can I select this
row when I have the identfier?
Best regards, Christian
---
> Yes, that did the trick, thank you! However, since
> qx.ui.table.model.Simple does fine without named column data, it would
> be worth thinking about reworking the remote table model accordingly.
> not having the repetitive column ids in the transferred code saves a lot
> of bandwith and with
Has anyone else observed this?
Christian has written me a private email stating he has also observed this
behavior with treevirtual (another table derivative).
It must be a relatively recent change with tables.
dperez wrote:
>
> Am I the only one observing this?
> The amount of flickering is v
10 matches
Mail list logo
