I profiled my application using the following code in background for every 10
seconds
qx.client.Timer.once (function ()
{
alert(qx.dev.ObjectSummary.getInfo());
}, this, 1);
Almost constantly it displays 300 total objects, which is g
2008/6/4 ckendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Is there any particular place in which you consider Qooxdoo to be better
> organized than SmartClient? I would welcome the criticism and open
> discussion. We do consider the structure and organization of SmartClient
> to
> be one of it's strengths, es
2008/6/4 ckendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen wrote:
> 2008/6/4 ckendrick : > WOW, absolutely stunning FUD there. There is no basis
> whatsoever for this > claim about SmartClient. I thought I was pretty clear
> about it being a general opinion on javascript libraries as opposed to
OK, it's only rsa.js from a different author which is GPL. The other
files look okay to me.
Can we proceed with this project by porting this code without the
rsa.js? GnuPG "gpg --gen-key" defaults to DSA and ElGamal. RSA is just
another option.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Bill Adams
Hi Andreas,
I like the idea of setting up a qooxdoo-contrib project. AFAIK
http://www.hanewin.net/encrypt/ is the only code available. The author
is in Neuried, Germany. Should we ask him if he would release it under
a suitable license?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Ecker [m
Guilherme Aiolfi wrote:
>
> Like I said I have decided to use SmartClient because of their widgets and
> data binding. But qooxdoo looks so organized and well structured that I'm
> considering qooxdoo again.
>
Is there any particular place in which you consider Qooxdoo to be better
organized t
Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen wrote:
>
> 2008/6/4 ckendrick :
>> WOW, absolutely stunning FUD there. There is no basis whatsoever for this
>> claim about SmartClient.
>
> I thought I was pretty clear about it being a general opinion on
> javascript libraries as opposed to frameworks.
>
When you refer
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Andreas Ecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> how is it going? ;-)
>
> Yes, I'd also recommend to make this effort a qooxdoo-contrib project.
> That way all interested people can quite easily work together to include
> such crypto features to qooxdoo.
>
Hi Bill,
how is it going? ;-)
Yes, I'd also recommend to make this effort a qooxdoo-contrib project.
That way all interested people can quite easily work together to include
such crypto features to qooxdoo.
To get started, lets proceed as follows:
* send me your SourceForge user name
* fill out
asaris a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
Hi
> Is it only me experiencing this problem?
>
I had the same problem, so I decided to filter the data server-side.
This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named
recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be propr
I followed the link and tried the 1st option "Enable the debug code". After
rebuilding the source script, I didn't see anywhere in the log showing
object distruction. Does it right anything in the log file? The document
doesn't say clearly where to check the destructed objects.
By the way, I am t
Howdy,
I'd like to encourage all list members to discuss other frameworks in a
fair and appropriate way. There simply isn't "the" perfect framework or
technology in general for all use cases and all users. qooxdoo itself
does not make such a claim, and it's fair to respect the work of all the
othe
For the build with APPLICATION_BUILD_LOG_LEVEL = off, in a rare case if I
need to turn-on logging in build mode to debug a sepcific problem without
re-building the code, is there a way to edit the scripts demobrowser.js and
demo.js temporarily? I can't see any global flag set in those scripts. Tel
2008/6/4 ckendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> WOW, absolutely stunning FUD there. There is no basis whatsoever for this
> claim about SmartClient.
I thought I was pretty clear about it being a general opinion on
javascript libraries as opposed to frameworks.
I obviously wrongly assumed that stating i
Hi Guilherme!
>> "make something"
Generally, you can start using qooxdoo just with the quickstart example,
but you are missing some (if not all) images. We will generate a new
version of quickstart within the next release of 0.8 that includes more
images. I am not sure if you can change the pat
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Guilherme Aiolfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ckendrick, looks like you know SmartClient.
> 2008/6/3 ckendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
yes, I think so :o)
just kiddin'
-
Check out the new SourceF
ckendrick, looks like you know SmartClient.
could you give me your opinion of smartclient vs qooxdoo?
pros and cons of each one?
Like I said I have decided to use SmartClient because of their widgets and
data binding. But qooxdoo looks so organized and well structured that I'm
considering qooxdo
Data cells have null values. Javascript converts null value to string
value "null" and it affects qx.ui.table.cellrenderer.Conditional regex
condition.
//.test(null) => //.test("null");
I would expect cell null values as zero length string in this case.
//.test(null) => //.test("");
patch
-
Hi Bill!
It would be nice having a contrib project which adds encryption and
decryption mechanisms based on GnuPG to qooxdoo. Since this
implemenation only consists of seven files, it should not be a big
project. In addition, qooxdoo will give you some comfort (e.g. for all
mouse event handling
Hi all,
I have data sets of 20 columns and 50-150 rows. Model is used by Table.
And 1 regex filter, that filters out 50%+ of rows. Unfortunately it's
too slow. It takes 5-10+ seconds to filter when calling applyFilters().
I have no event listeners. My quick benchmark shows that hideRows()
slow
Bug submitted.
I noticed it fails when container folder is opened and closed. It's not
that complex as I described before.
asaris
Alexander Back wrote:
Hi Asaris,
thanks for this small example. I've just tried it out and can reproduce
the error.
It would be great if you could open a bug
Hi all,
qooxdoo 0.7.x
It's possible to set data only once in qx.ui.table.model.Filtered. Next
calls to method still keeps _fullArr from previous data set.
Can we override method setData in class qx.ui.table.model.Filtered?
-
setData: function ()
{
arguments.call
Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen wrote:
>
> 2008/5/24 Guilherme Aiolfi :
> I, not being a qooxdoo developer, can be so blunt to warn you about
> using frameworks like SmartClient. They don't scale up. You'll end up
> wanting to do something (your customer requests a new feature) and
> realizing you either ha
23 matches
Mail list logo
