I want to do an application whose goal is to present a massive amount
of data, a bit like the api-viewer does. It doesn't require any ajax
transport. Hopefully, it will also be autogenerated so that my data
will be in a YAML (a superset of JSON) which is easier to write and
converted into the final
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD - Novlog <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I defined a singleton class.
How did you define your singleton? The getInstance() wrapper is produced
when your class has a type:"singleton" entry.
>
> I noticed that it is working to get the singleton
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mansay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Latest code of this class include this comment:
> "// TODO do we really need these header? (fj)"
>
> Well, for me a little tweak of this header allow me to gain Rails
> recognition of ajax calls,
> and so generate a co
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am porting my application classes by hand over to the new .8 and on my
> second class I ran into a bit of trouble. First, it is subclassed from a
> qooxdoo class that is not longer available, qx.util.manager.Object. Since
>
I am porting my application classes by hand over to the new .8 and on my
second class I ran into a bit of trouble. First, it is subclassed from a
qooxdoo class that is not longer available, qx.util.manager.Object. Since
this is a class that mostly just manages lists of objects I changed it to
desce
Hello,
Latest code of this class include this comment:
"// TODO do we really need these header? (fj)"
Well, for me a little tweak of this header allow me to gain Rails recognition
of ajax calls,
and so generate a complete and clean QooXDoo/Rails RIA.
Maybe it could be the case for other frame
Hi,
I defined a singleton class.
I noticed that it is working to get the singleton this way :
var wf = n.WindowFactory.getInstance;
but it doesn't work to get it this way :
var wf = n.WindowFactory.getInstance();
In that last case, I got the error message "getInstance() is not a
function".
In
If it were me, and I was going to be replacing everything on the page, and
this was a known scenario, I would simply create a new page for it. That way
you get the benefit of forced garbage collection.
Jim
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Chris Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a Stand
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 13:45, Sebastian Werner wrote:
> Dynamic theme changes are not supported anymore in 0.8. There is still
> some API available to do this in qx.theme.manager.*, but this is not
> supported anymore.
I hope my first response to this did not seem too aggressive - it horrif
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD - Novlog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it valid to use a Command without a keystroke ?
>
> I want to have some Command to share action (eventually in several
> different menu) but those action won't be started by keyboard but only
> via menu.
>
> I don't know if
Hi,
Is it valid to use a Command without a keystroke ?
I want to have some Command to share action (eventually in several
different menu) but those action won't be started by keyboard but only
via menu.
I don't know if I can instantiate a qx.event.Command() or a
qx.event.Command(null) or a
11 matches
Mail list logo
