On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And as for the new config.json file as compared to the older config, I don't
> like it (yet). There is a nice document that tells what all the section are
> but really doesn't tell you how to use this new config file to your
Experts,
In 0.7 most widgets were also containers. So I could for example
add a checkbox to the tab of a tabview widget to enable/disable the
tab.
[tab1 x][tab2 x][tab3 x]__
| |
|
I figured this issue out myself by looking at the example.json,
application.json, and the base.json files in the SDK. In case anyone else
has the same issue I did, the way I ended up solving this was to define my
own job with the appropriate settings in the JSON file and then to call the
build sou
Hi,
qx 0.7.3
IE 6
I have a requirement where the user presses the tab key to edit Item price
on a Table. He does it on each row. He doesn't like to use the mouse to
dblclick the cell, as he edits almost 1000 such rows continuosly.
There is only one such editable column.
I just tried the followi
I have to admit that I didn't get the legacy route to work straight off
either and went to manually re-writing the classes after it converted them
to legacy classes. I needed to re-write most of my classes anyway because
they are heavily based on layouts and that is totally changed in .8. So I
simp
Not to sound negative but this has been done for years already.
1) package up a backend for your platform. Django + Nginx
2) create an installer
3) when user clicks on link, launch httpd(or run as service) and start
firefox.
It's brain dead simple, unless the developer is a Microsoftie who is on
Fabian Jakobs wrote:
Hi Chris,
(somehow managed to send this post directly to Andreas, when I meant
it for the whole list! Trying again)
Hi Andreas,
nice demo. ;-)
As there are some issues with your inline app (IE6 and Safari?), could
you open bug reports with a stripped-down versio
I realise Alexander is on holiday right now so I'm leaving this as a note
for when he returns as much as anything.
I'd like to add my vote to this - a rich text editor is important and we've
abandoned the FCKeditor integration because it's too slow.
Petr - have you tried the latest SVN version of
Hi Chris,
> (somehow managed to send this post directly to Andreas, when I meant
> it for the whole list! Trying again)
>
>
> Hi Andreas,
>> nice demo. ;-)
>>
>> As there are some issues with your inline app (IE6 and Safari?), could
>> you open bug reports with a stripped-down version of your code
I'd like to inspire you to use qooxdoo to write gadgets for igoogle and other
environments.
I wrote a little gadget, displaying actual events, like concerts, fairs and
others from my project at http://event-4all.org/ http://event-4all.org/ -
you can double click an entry and if it's an event fro
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:47 PM, thron7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gaetan de Menten wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is my experience with migrating my code to 0.8. It was quite a
>> painful experience for me...
>>
>> In the hope you can make it a more pleasant experience for others,
>> here are my
It didn't work for me too. So I went the same route. Manually moving legacy
staff to 0.8.
Ian Horst
thron7 wrote:
>
> Gaetan de Menten wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is my experience with migrating my code to 0.8. It was quite a
>> painful experience for me...
>>
>> In the hope you can make it a
Hi Thomas,
Happy to add a new bug --
> Eh, by the way, could you open up a bug for it, meaning adding wiki docs
> ...?! Just paste your text in.
>
-- #1461 (looking forward to fixing some of the little critters
someday... :-) )
> thanks for your feedback. We'll see what we can come up w
Gaetan de Menten wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is my experience with migrating my code to 0.8. It was quite a
> painful experience for me...
>
> In the hope you can make it a more pleasant experience for others,
> here are my comments about the migration itself. I also had many
> issues in 0.8 which
Gaetan de Menten wrote:
> Here is one regression in 0.8: moving the qooxdoo lib around is a pain:
>
> In 0.7.x you only had to change the path to where Qooxdoo is installed
> in one place. Now you have to change it in 3 places: twice in
> config.json and one in generate.py, which is especially ug
Eh, by the way, could you open up a bug for it, meaning adding wiki docs
...?! Just paste your text in.
Thanks, Thomas
Chris Banford wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Really an excellent email this one -- I'm sure that this belongs in
> the wiki docs somewhere where new users would read it.
>
> I've figu
Chris,
thanks for your feedback. We'll see what we can come up with. I think
the biggest hurdle is the gap between the 'gui' template's config.json
(nearly empty) and one of the templates like 'migration' or
'with-contrib' that actually make slight changes to jobs, as you
suggested. We are wor
Hi Gaetan!
> > Great. As a quick workaround, to get your code going, you could add the
> > following compiler hints to your Application.js:
> >
> > /*
> > #require(qx.locale.Manager)
> > #require(qx.locale.Date)
> > */
> >
> > This is of course awful, since you are fixing missing dependencies for
Hi Gaetan!
> I *was* speaking about inter-theme inheritance, which doesn't seem to
> be implemented (or at least used) for decorations, while it *is*
> implemented and used for appearances.
Yes, this should read inter-appearance inheritance. When talking about
appearances, theme is often used as
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Andreas Ecker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > There is no inheritance of individual decorations in a theme. We
>> > just did not see the need for it yet and it is not on our roadmap.
>> > Personally I am reluctant to add just another level of complexity
>> > to the
Hi Hugh!
> > There is no inheritance of individual decorations in a theme. We
> > just did not see the need for it yet and it is not on our roadmap.
> > Personally I am reluctant to add just another level of complexity
> > to the theming system. I would rather live with some repetition in
> >
I have updated the bug at
http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1455 , and also added an
entry at the Anti-Pattern wiki page
http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/0.8/antipatterns#abundandly_requiring_other_classes
. This section talks in general about requiring classes in your code.
Essenti
I made a spike solution for alternative action for contextmenu. Look at the
attachment.
I don't want keyboard to be involved.
On mouse left click, it shows contextmenu icon for short time (200ms seems fine
for me), then disappears. When you move mouse over, contextmenu appears.
Any comments, s
I made a spike solution for alternative action for contextmenu. Look at the
attachment.
I don't want keyboard to be involved.
On mouse left click, it shows contextmenu icon for short time (200ms seems fine
for me), then disappears. When you move mouse over, contextmenu appears.
Any comments, s
> > I see there is a lot of repetition in decorations. For example,
> the
> > "input-focused" and "input-disabled" decorations only differ from
> > the
> > "input" decoration for a few keys each. It would certainly make
> > decorations declarations shorter to have some kind of inheritance
> > sys
It is not Sourceforge who blocked the file but you received an
automatic reply from the mail server of someone at Fujitsu Siemens
that blocked the file.
On 8 Oct 2008, at 09:41, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:21 AM, thron7
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> this is just a
(somehow managed to send this post directly to Andreas, when I meant it
for the whole list! Trying again)
Hi Andreas,
nice demo. ;-)
As there are some issues with your inline app (IE6 and Safari?), could
you open bug reports with a stripped-down version of your code as a
sample?
After playi
Although this isn't implemented there is a way to accomplish it if you
really needed to.
Before your class do something like:
var my_input =
{
// style info here
};
then later:
"input" : input,
"input-focused" : qx.lang.Object.mergeWith(
{
// focused propertied here
}, my_input),
"input-d
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:53 AM, thron7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaetan de Menten wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:21 AM, thron7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> this is just a quick reply to confirm that the behaviour has indeed
>>> changed between 0.7 and 0.8 - and not intentionally. But the
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Fabian Jakobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaetan de Menten schrieb:
>> Here is one regression in 0.8: moving the qooxdoo lib around is a pain:
>>
>> In 0.7.x you only had to change the path to where Qooxdoo is installed
>> in one place. Now you have to change it in
Gaetan de Menten wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:21 AM, thron7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> this is just a quick reply to confirm that the behaviour has indeed
>> changed between 0.7 and 0.8 - and not intentionally. But there are some
>> strange phenomena involved so we need to look int
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Fabian Jakobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaetan de Menten schrieb:
>> I couldn't find a way to get to the currently focused widget in 0.8.
>> Anyone knows the way to do it?
> These method is missing in 0.8. I just added them to trunk. If you have
> trunk you can
Gaetan de Menten wrote:
>
> * I had to add #asset hints to my code, while it previously worked
> without.
>
> * I had to add these lines (copied from the skeleton) to my
> Application.js, to have debugging output. Couldn't find this mentioned
> anywhere, and the migration script could have adde
Hi,
it might be that you are missing the qooxdoo setting for qx.theme. Are
you including the application.json in your config? And are you building
on its jobs? If so, your jobs would inherit the "settings" key. Try
copying over the common/settings key from base.json and see what it
does. Alex
(somehow managed to send this post directly to Andreas, when I meant it
for the whole list! Trying again)
Hi Andreas,
nice demo. ;-)
As there are some issues with your inline app (IE6 and Safari?), could
you open bug reports with a stripped-down version of your code as a
sample?
After playi
Gaetan de Menten schrieb:
> Here is one regression in 0.8: moving the qooxdoo lib around is a pain:
>
> In 0.7.x you only had to change the path to where Qooxdoo is installed
> in one place. Now you have to change it in 3 places: twice in
> config.json and one in generate.py, which is especially ug
Gaetan de Menten schrieb:
> I noticed that (among others):
> * decoration/form/input.png
> * decoration/form/input-focused.png
> are larger than 1pixel but are just the same vertical gradient across
> the whole width, and their decoration use a "repeat-x" property. Is
> there a reason for those ima
Gaetan de Menten schrieb:
> Hi again,
>
> I see there is a lot of repetition in decorations. For example, the
> "input-focused" and "input-disabled" decorations only differ from the
> "input" decoration for a few keys each. It would certainly make
> decorations declarations shorter to have some kin
Gaetan de Menten schrieb:
> When saving a form, I need to make sure my local datastore is updated
> with the on-screen value of the fields of the form. This happens
> automatically when the user saves the form through the "save" button
> on the toolbar, since the current field loose focus. But if t
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:49 PM, thron7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you would have had to clear the cache anyway, even if you would be using
> just the trunk all the time, since I made a change to some cache object
> format that made existing trunk caches invalid. (We previously had an
> automatic
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:21 AM, thron7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is just a quick reply to confirm that the behaviour has indeed
> changed between 0.7 and 0.8 - and not intentionally. But there are some
> strange phenomena involved so we need to look into it further. If you
> could open a b
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD - Novlog
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it OK not to have parameter in your main function ?
Yes, this is a stripped down version of the app generated by
create-application, so I hope it's correct. Besides in JS, a function
can be called with l
Hi,
Is it OK not to have parameter in your main function ?
That parameter nammed arguments look like used but not passed.
Also, I have a question (I still never used static with qooXdoo) what
is the meaning of this.self(arguments) ?
Why passing argument ?
Hope this will help ...
On 7 Oct 2008
Hi Gaetan,
this is just a quick reply to confirm that the behaviour has indeed
changed between 0.7 and 0.8 - and not intentionally. But there are some
strange phenomena involved so we need to look into it further. If you
could open a bug for it, adding your Application.js, that would be awesome
robust schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> i am a newbie in qooxdoo...I am trying to add two widgets to the container
> which has the HBox layout. I want to set the width of the each widget
> manually. How can I do this?
>
> Thanks,
> Robust
>
Just use "setWidth" on each child widget. This sets the width manuall
45 matches
Mail list logo
