Hi,
I don't know if I fully understood how object pooling works. For example, if
I create a pool of ten qx.io.remote.Rpc objects that I want to use and reuse
when the request is completed.
this.__pool = new qx.util.ObjectPool(10);
for ( var i=0; i<10; i++)
{
this.__pool.poolOb
Hello,
I checked out version 19060 (8.2) from svn and noticed that the
ColumnVisibilityButton does not work anymore. It opens and lets you check
or uncheck the fields, but it doesn't do anything. I also noticed that when
I click on the scrollbar, it scrolls only 5 or so items at a time regardles
Hi,
here comes my next question on the remote tables.
I'm working on a possibility for the user to edit the table data on
the user interface without immediately applying it to the database.
This is, of course, no problem when only cell data is entered. But it
is problematic if a user wants to ad
Hi,
thanks to both of you for the quick answers. I indeed use the LIMIT
clauses of mysql for requesting data from the table. I do have an idea
how one could make sorting by text-entries instead of id's possible in
Qooxdoo but I haven't tried yet.
Best,
Michael
-
all,
what i believe to be a first stable release of the soap client is out.
it has properly de-serialized lots of variable type combinations, and i
believe it's ready for third-party testing.
i hope you find it useful.
best regards,
burak
Hello,
I committed a first version of a databinding feature for
qx.ui.treevirtual.TreeVirtual, using a jsonrpc store, in the contrib://qcl
in the qcl namespace. You can have a look at the code here:
https://qooxdoo-contrib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/qooxdoo-contrib/trunk/qooxdoo-contrib/qcl/tru
Hi,
in my case the list contains ListItems, they ar not editable but the user
has controls in the interface to remove or add such predefined ListItems. I
would like the array from the model to be automatically updated to
correspond to what the user has added or removed in the list.
If it is not y
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the reply - this did not work though. So here is my code:
properties:
{
fonts: {"init": null, "event": "changeFonts", "check":
"qx.data.Array", "apply": "_applyGeneric"}
},
construct: function()
{
this.base(arguments);
this.setFon
Hi there,
Am 13.05.2009 um 17:22 schrieb marino99:
> doesn't anybody have a solution / clue for me? Or is it even
> impossible to
> have one instance of a Java class and use it the way instances are
> usually
> used? Maybe I didn't make my point clear enough, so here's the code
> I used
> f
Why do you need a single instance of RemoteService?
You should move your state machine away from RPCTest. You can register a
Spring bean (which will have only once isntance by default) and handover to
it by lloking up the Spring bean. Look at Spring framework.
Look at how I am doing?
p
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:22 AM, marino99 wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> doesn't anybody have a solution / clue for me? Or is it even impossible to
> have one instance of a Java class and use it the way instances are usually
> used? Maybe I didn't make my point clear enough, so here's the code I used
Hi again,
doesn't anybody have a solution / clue for me? Or is it even impossible to
have one instance of a Java class and use it the way instances are usually
used? Maybe I didn't make my point clear enough, so here's the code I used
for testing:
var button1 = new qx.ui.form.Button("setTestStri
Hello,
The call to qx.bom.Document.getWidth() and qx.bom.Document.getHeight()
brings back invalid results in Opera (all versions it seems). It brings
back a width and height much bigger than the actual screen size. Calls to
getBounds() work in Opera. Is this a known issue?
/* **
Hello Massimo,
as far as i know there is no way to set this behavior in the API.
The only thing i can think of is patching the qooxdoo table for
yourself. You could change the variables
var horNeeded = false;
var verNeeded = false;
to
var horNeeded = true;
var verNee
Hello Jean-Noel,
you have to use a mix of attempt one and three.
First you have to define the property itself. Therefore you have to
add the property name to the properties definition like you did in
point 1. The only thing you should not do is to add the array as the
init value. This code
Hello,
the list contains in the default setting only list items and the user
can't change anything in the list item. So a binding back from the
listitem to the model would not make much sense. But if you use some
kind of editable widgets in the list, that is an important feature as
you sai
Hello Vincent,
if you need to access additionally the qooxdoo class, you can do so by
using
this.constructor
With that you can check on equality. The following code will return
true for example.
var b = new qx.ui.form.Button();
alert(b.constructor === qx.ui.form.Button);
Best,
Martin
Am 1
> I use "this.classname" and it works fine.
Exactly what I needed. Thanks a million, and again sorry for the basic
question.
V.
--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production sca
Hi Vincent,
I use "this.classname" and it works fine.
Regards
Lutz
Vincent Bernardi schrieb:
> Hi everyone,
> I feel a bit stupid for asking such a basic question, but how do you
> get the Qx class of an object at run-time, either as a class object or
> as a string? I couldn't find anything
Hello,
I am trying to make a binding from a List to a List widget, however I see no
options in the controller to make the binding bidirectional. Currently every
change in the model is reflected in the widget, but I would like every
change made in the widget to be also propagated in the model.
Is
Hi,
is there a way to get scrollers always visible?
Thanks in advance.
MAssimo
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Table-scroller-always-visible-tp23519365p23519365.html
Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Hi everyone,
I feel a bit stupid for asking such a basic question, but how do you
get the Qx class of an object at run-time, either as a class object or
as a string? I couldn't find anything about that in the documentation
and my blind attempts through this.self(arguments) failed miserably.
Hello,
today I tried to define a qx.data.Array property on one of my class (to use
data binding with a List on it). I could not manage to understand how to
properly initialize this property to make it work.
I tried several things:
1) Defining the property as: myProperty: { init: new
qx.data.Arra
It works! I love Qooxdoo..
Martin Wittemann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> there is no "official" way to turn that feature off, at least no way i
> know.
> The only thing you can do is to patch the ResourceManager in the
> framework manually for the time you need the desired behavior.
> Just open t
24 matches
Mail list logo
