When you go from having nothing in the box to having something, then it's
selection has changed, that's why the event fires. The simple way around it
is to not add the event listener to the select box until after the items
have been added. This is what I do and I am having no problems and I don't
n
For one, a Request object is a singleton. By definition it can only be used
once. I assume they decided to make it a singleton because the life of a
Request is not clear cut. At any point in time you are not fully sure if it
is done doing it's job so that it can be used again. It was easier to make
Hi all,
It seems as though 'Request' objects can only be used once. Code that tries
to reuse [1] will only send the request once. Even though I 'setData' on
each button press subsequent sends do nothing. Additionally the "completed"
listener also only fires the first time.
This is somewhat counter
For some reason I forgot to change the server service to accept GET
requests. The following code does not have the problem described above:
var req = new qx.io.remote.Request("/library", "POST");
button.addListener("execute", function(e) {
req.setData("isbn=" + isbn.getValue());
Awesome! Thanks so much for your help. I haven't run this code yet, but I
appreciate it.
-deech
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Fink, Andreas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've implemented the functionality by myself like this:
>
> every window (I create windows from a xml description) has a button which
>
And the debug statement 'this.debug(req.getData())' correctly outputs the
'isbn' parameter and its value.
thanks ...
-deech
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:43 PM, aditya siram wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have the following snippet of code [1] that send a GET request with data
> field 'isbn' to the server. Ho
Hi all,
I have the following snippet of code [1] that send a GET request with data
field 'isbn' to the server. However Firebug does not show the parameter at
all. Instead it shows only a nocache parameter in 'Parameters' and something
about a POST message in 'Response' [2].
Has anyone seen this be
Hi,
how can I add our web application to the qooxdoo real-life examples?
Thanks
Marcel
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-f
Upload was missing - here it is
http://www.nabble.com/file/p24078320/Application.js Application.js
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SelectionAPI-woes-%28part-1%29-tp24077884p24078320.html
Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
I will. Thanks for pointing this out.
thron7 a écrit :
> Maybe you want to look at the UploadWidget
> (http://qooxdoo.org/contrib/project#uploadwidget), which is 0.8-ready,
> according to its Manifest. There is also an UploadJavaApplet, but looks
> like 0.7 code. Not sure about the download, th
Maybe you want to look at the UploadWidget
(http://qooxdoo.org/contrib/project#uploadwidget), which is 0.8-ready,
according to its Manifest. There is also an UploadJavaApplet, but looks
like 0.7 code. Not sure about the download, though, this is browser
business.
T.
Vincent Vandenschrick wrot
I am finding the new Selection API really hard to work with.
1. ChangeSelection events and Add.
It appears SelectBox is firing a ChangeSelection event when the first
ListItem is added. I am using the trunk (0.8.3-pre) version.
I would expect a ChangeSelection event to be triggered by a call to
Forget the question.
It seems that it is just impossible to browse the local FS in
JavaScript, mainly for security reasons.
I think I will fall back to plain html for choosing the file to upload
and to the hidden iframe method that was submitted to the list for file
download.
Life is hard...
C
Sorry, I did not spot the post about the roadmap, ignore the last question.
I hope the animation framework for Widgets will be in final 1.0 (0.9 would
be even better)
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Jean-Noël Rivasseau wrote:
> Hi. Actually I had another bug deep hidden that caused troubles. I
Hi. Actually I had another bug deep hidden that caused troubles. I managed
to fix this, but then ran against the bug you gave me the fix for, so this
was still very useful :)
I am good to go now. What about the roadmap I asked ? ;)
Thanks
Jean-Noel
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jean-Noël Riv
Jean-Noel,
I use popups to display a table object in response to entry in a text
field, and I think the hiding behavior is appropriate for that usage. I
think typical user interface functionality in local apps works that way
as well. However, I'm wondering how you're using popups in your
applica
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone had already implemented a local FS browse
functionality in a Qooxdoo (0.8.2) application. I may be blind, but I
couldn't find any dedicated component.
Here is what I need to achieve :
1/ Upload binary data
- Let the user browse its local FS for some file (maybe
I did method 1 but I still have the bug. I think it's due to something else
that what you originally thought.
Let me see if I can gather more information.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Martin Wittemann wrote:
> Hello Jean-Noel,
> I gave my example code a try in a 0.8.2 environment and as you
Howdy!
> 1. You path the qooxdoo class qx.ui.form.AbstractField by adding this
> to the members section:
>
>
> /**
> * Resets the value to the default
> */
> resetValue : function() {
> this.setValue("");
> },
>
>
> 2. You use an evil JavaScript trick to patch the
Hello Jean-Noel,
I gave my example code a try in a 0.8.2 environment and as you said it
didn't work. As a workaround i thought of patching the textfield to
handle null values. That way you could leave the binding without a
converter and the problem is solved. There are two ways you could
Hi Jean-Noël!
> Btw, it would be *very* nice if there was a roadmap posted somewhere
> regarding new releases shipping dates and their features. Currently I
> have no idea when 0.8.3 will be out and what will be in it.
Apparently you don't know about the roadmap document yet at:
http://qooxdoo.or
You should be able to remove the listener from within your own code
var popupMan = qx.ui.popup.Manager.getInstance();
qx.bom.Element.addListener(window, "blur", popupMan.hideAll, popupMan);
HTH, Matt
Jean-Noël Rivasseau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the popup manager there is a 'feature' which I strongly
Hi,
In the popup manager there is a 'feature' which I strongly dislike:
// Hide all popups on window blur
qx.bom.Element.addListener(window, "blur", this.hideAll, this);
This causes all popups to disappear when switching tabs on the browser,
applications on the system, etc. I prefer them
Hi Martin, I am still not 100% sure it's a complete duplicate. Your bug
reproduces OK but that does not necessarily mean your fix will take care of
my original bug. I am waiting for your workaround to test
jean-Noel
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Martin Wittemann <
martin.wittem...@1und1.de> w
Hi,
thats good to hear. So i close the bug as a dulicate and take a look
at a workaround after im done with my current task and come back to
you later. I hope i could find a solution for you.
Best,
Martin
Am 17.06.2009 um 11:20 schrieb Jean-Noël Rivasseau:
Hi,
I reproduced the test you g
Hi,
I reproduced the test you gave me in the bug and yes, it fails. I am on
0.8.2 and would prefer not to update to trunk... is there some workaround I
can apply until I upgrade to 0.8.3 ?
Btw, it would be *very* nice if there was a roadmap posted somewhere
regarding new releases shipping dates a
Hi,
It really looks like the bug I fixed yesterday. Jean-Noel, could you
please check the code snipped in the bug report to verify that the
code is reproducing your bug?
Best,
Martin
Am 17.06.2009 um 05:26 schrieb Vincent Vandenschrick:
> Hi Jean-Noel,
> It seems to me a duplicate of the b
27 matches
Mail list logo