[qooxdoo-devel] Contrib: Hijax and cache directory

2009-07-01 Thread Helder Magalhães
Hi everyone, Just noticed "Hijax" being committed to the contrib repository. Without investigating the contribution itself, I've noticed a "cache" directory ("Hijax/trunk/demo/default/cache") being committed, something which probably wasn't intended. I'd report this as an issue but "Hijax" wasn'

[qooxdoo-devel] How to restrict keystrokes in a TextField.

2009-07-01 Thread Raymond Cote
Hello, I have a TextField which I'd like to limit to accepting only digits. I've added a listener to the TextField and can grab each keystroke as it is entered. However, I'm unclear as to how I could decide whether or not to let this keystroke through. The TextField is not being updated until

[qooxdoo-devel] Local time-out error for async RPC call

2009-07-01 Thread Narasimha Patkar
Hi, I am using async RPC call in an application built using Qooxdoo 0.8.2-sdk and I am using example back-end provided with Qooxdoo implemented in perl. In the client application I have something like this, ### var rpc = new qx.io.remote.Rpc(); rpc.s

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Refactored JavaRpc - JSONObject from json.org

2009-07-01 Thread Andreas Junghans
Hi Jean-Baptiste, Am 01.07.2009 um 14:33 schrieb Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog: > On Jul 1, 2009, at 13:28 , Andreas Junghans wrote: >> [CUT] >> The serialization behaviour you need is quite different from what's >> currently done (JavaBean-based vs. attribute-based). I don't think it >> would b

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Refactored JavaRpc - JSONObject from json.org

2009-07-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog
On Jul 1, 2009, at 13:28 , Andreas Junghans wrote: [CUT] The serialization behaviour you need is quite different from what's currently done (JavaBean-based vs. attribute-based). I don't think it would be good idea to completely replace the existing approach. Instead, the algorithm should be conf

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Refactored JavaRpc - JSONObject from json.org

2009-07-01 Thread Andreas Junghans
Hi Jean-Baptiste, Am 01.07.2009 um 09:03 schrieb Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog: >>> BTW, what about the transient Java keyword ? Are transient >>> attributes >>> excluded from json serialization ? >> >> Just to make it clear, this point no longer concerns the low-level >> JSON lib (layer b2 ab

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Refactored JavaRpc - JSONObject from json.org

2009-07-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog
Hi Andreas, Thanks for all your answers ! On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:21 , Andreas Junghans wrote: > Hi Jean-Baptiste, > > Am 30.06.2009 um 09:46 schrieb Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog: > >>> Anyway, why are you so keen on replacing the low-level JSON lib on >>> the >>> Java side? What's wrong with t