Hello Florian,
the controller needs for internal purposes a reference from every tree
folder to the corresponding model item too. So there is a more or less
internal API for accessing there reference:
treeItem.getUserData("model")
But as I said, its more or less internal. Its not documented in
Hello Florian,
there is no problem send even more than three mails per day on the
list. ;)
Thats true, some of the tree manipulations are really expensive.
Storing a reference to the parent would sure help but as long as the
model comes from some kind of business data from the client, I thi
Hello Florian,
can you perhaps supply some code snippet which makes it possible for
me to reproduce the bug? Perhaps you are doing something special I
didn't think of while fixing the bug. Anyway, I'll fix it as soon as I
have the code snippet and can reproduce the misbehavior.
Best,
Mart
Yes, unfortunately:
- it looks like a split pane inside of a split pane (double borders around a
and *)
- the resize policy of an inner split pane (0.3, 0.7) is based on the inner
split pane size, not on the total size
Derrell Lipman wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, GlebM wrote:
>
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, GlebM wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone!
>
> I want to make a layout like this:
> |a|*|b|
>
> I want a and b to occupy 20% of the space, and have a min width. I want *
> to
> occupy the rest.
> Also, I want a and b to be resizable with a mouse.
> Then, I want to be able to
Hi, everyone!
I want to make a layout like this:
|a|*|b|
I want a and b to occupy 20% of the space, and have a min width. I want * to
occupy the rest.
Also, I want a and b to be resizable with a mouse.
Then, I want to be able to show/hide a and b.
Split Pane, unfortunately, only allows two compo
Hello again,
i promise, this is my third and last mail to the list for today ;-)
When working with qx.data.controller.Tree and qx.data.store.Json i
experienced, that some tree manipulations on the model are relative complex,
i.e. removing a child from its parents because its not trivial to find t
Hello Martin,
i still have trouble with this issue, although bug #2504 is filed as fixed.
It comes up when i call qx.data.Array.remove(). When the script reaches line
296 in qx.data.Array.splice()
this.fireDataEvent("changeBubble", {value: this});
you still get the error mentioned above in qx.da
Hello list,
i am using data binding with qx.data.controller.Tree together with drag and
drop. The drop events give me the qx.ui.tree.Tree{File,Folder} targets (or
one of its children). In order to manipulate the model i need to know the
corresponding qx.data.model object which is the source bound
Yes, I will contribute the code. It's really not quite "ready for prime time"
as I think there will still be some design changes, but it is already quite
powerful. For example, you pass your form description to the compiler, and
the compiler then generates a set of functions (thunks) which, when
e
Hi dave,
thats interesting! We have planed such a feature too for the
framework. (http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2295) Do you
plan to share your code? Perhaps we can benefit from your ideas /
implementation? I have today added a qooxdoo form which can render a
given set of form
Yes, that makes perfect sense -- thanks!
FYI, I am building a form compiler that parses a hierarchical form
description and generates code to instantiate all the widgets, create a
model, and bind all the widgets to the model. The goal is to make most such
binding issues transparent to the user of
Hello Dave,
thank you ver much for the compliments. :)
Thats something we are aware of. You can bind the selection instead.
See the code here as an example:
// create the select box
selectBox = new qx.ui.form.SelectBox();
selectBox.add(new qx.ui.form.ListItem("a"));
selectBox.add(new qx.ui.for
Hello Benoît,
I have to admit that I don't get your use case right. You want to use
"model.tree" on the first load as model for the tree controller and on
the second load, you want to use "model.tree.kids"? Do you want to set
the selection with the second bind? :
> this.store.bind('model.tre
I've been doing a lot with Martin's data binding framework in 0.8.3-pre.
Truly amazing stuff! Very, very nice work, Martin.
One thing I've noticed, however, is that as of 0.8.3-pre, the "value"
property of SelectBox and List are deprecated. Looking at the code, I can
see why this is -- the goal t
Hi Benoît,
I'm afraid I can't help you since I don't know too much about data
binding. But Martin, our data binding guru, will take a look at your
problem sometime this weekend, so please have a little patience.
Regards,
Daniel
benco schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a bit stuck and I really need so
Hi skar,
qx.ui.embed.Html is the weapon of choice if you want to insert plain
HTML into your application. But it won't solve your problem as any
Javascript within the HTML won't be evaluated.
Generally speaking, it's preferable to keep all the Javascript code
within your qooxdoo application. Ma
Hello,
I'm a bit stuck and I really need some help here.
I'm working on a Tree that can be loaded progressively on deploy and
selection events. I also would like using the new binding features with that
tree (namely the Tree Controller and the Json Store).
The problem is I don't know how to ma
Hi,
I want to be able to add a DOM element received from the server
when the user clicks on a button. I'm able to get it as the content in
an ajax call. But how do I set it to be the content of a window?
Also, the div could have both static HTML content or sometimes js
scripts with HTML too. Wil
Alexander,
Thanks for the quick response. I've created ticket 2617
(http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2617)
Regards,
Nick Glencross
>> I'm having some trouble with using an HtmlArea in a Stack, and suspect
>> that it doesn't initialise properly because it is hidden when it is
>> cons
Hi Nick,
thanks for reporting this issue. Could you please file a bug report for this
issue?
http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=contrib&component=HtmlArea
Just assign this issue to me directly. I'll take a look.
thanks,
Alex
On Friday 24 July 2009 Nick Glencross wrot
Hi Gene,
We chose this approach as we thought it would modular. We need to revisit
that thought.
Anyways thanks a lot for your response.
Thanks & Regards
Narasimha
quote author="Gene Amtower">
Hi Narasimha,
Upon reading through what you're trying to achieve, I wonder if you're
going about it u
Hi all,
I'm having some trouble with using an HtmlArea in a Stack, and suspect
that it doesn't initialise properly because it is hidden when it is
constructed.
I've attached a small test case which demonstrates the problem:
* When the application is first run, you'll get a working Editor
(whi
23 matches
Mail list logo
