Hello Daniel,
this code really looks like there should be an easier solution to this. I
tried to get your code working in the playground but failed. Could you
perhaps explain what you want to achieve? Especially what data you want to
have in what property (label, model). If i have that, I think I
Hello Qooxdoo Guys,
I still have the same problem. I am sending a POST request to my cherrypy
server via the qx.io2.HttpRequest object. The data being sent is the string
representation of a dictionary. For example, using
data = {"people" : "Tom & Jerry"};
data = qx.util.Json.stringi
Derrell,
Please refer to the links
a) http://www.trirand.com/jqgrid/jqgrid.html , From the left tree select
"Advanced - > Grid as Subgrid"
b)
http://www.dhtmlx.com/docs/products/dhtmlxGrid/samples/07_extended_modes/03_pro_subgrids.html
The main advantage we get is flexibility to specify different
I am a Alejandro friend,
We can get the binary image with the header
when the next code we get the binary image:
I get the binary with qx.io.remote.Request
but we don't know what to do in QOOXDOO, we need to know how to insert
this code in qooxdoo to see the image if that is posible.
Grettings
Hello guys,
I got a question concerning the qx.ui.form.SelectBox and DataBinding. I need
to bind label and value of a selectbox to an array. By now I was using the
old (deprecated) behavior and wanted to change this.
While browsing the list archive I found a somehow complicated solution (this
co
Hi,
I'm afraid that this is not possible using POST. There is responseType
property in Request class that says:
responseType
Response type of request.
The response type is a MIME type, default is text/plain. Other
supported MIME types are text/javascript, text/html, application/json,
applicatio
I want to know how can i load a image to my qooxdoo Widget.
The image is remotely generated with a certain parameters send to PHP (PHP
generated the image).
I have a way to generate the image and its work, but i want to do it a
better way.
*The working way is:
Example:
var params1 = "¶ms1=png";
va
Hi Jean,
I think that very efficient way to improve compiler is to write it in
C++ :-) It's python and I think that speed was no primary goal when
started writing it (Python language and Generator itself). There are
extensions to python that tries to jit compile some parts (don't know
their names,
I'm not sure if it is still useful to report such issue, especially
reporting mailling list issue on the mailling list :-), but in case :
today, I sent 2 messages on sourceforge lists, one on qooxdoo list and
one other : few hours after having sent the message, still nothing.
This happen quite
Hi Thomas,
On Sep 28, 2009, at 23:39 , thron7 wrote:
>> I did some chrono and got 3 minutes !!!
>> It's just too long for a very simple application (15 classes, all
>> included) without translation, without ressources.
>
> Standard "Playground" application, 2 (!) app classes (but 240 classes
> in
Hi,
Running the 'lint' option may highlight instances that you may not be
unaware of.
Cheers,
Nick
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Loïc Bresson -- Novlog
wrote:
> thron7 wrote:
>> Read this: http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/0.8/classes#instance_members
>
> Thanks, I didn't know about that, an
thron7 wrote:
> Read this: http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/0.8/classes#instance_members
Thanks, I didn't know about that, and it helped. But now I'm wondering
if they are not other bad initializations elsewhere in our application.
We'll have to check that carefully.
--
Loïc Bresson
Not sure if I understood you correctly, but if I did you should know
that cannot rely on hash codes to uniquely identify objects in between
sessions. The hash code is basically a counter, so if you create (e.g.)
objectA and read it's has code, then re-run your application creating
other objects
thron7 wrote:
> Counter question: Why do you need to know? Most people get along just
> fine, without ever worrying about the object registry. What do you want
> to achieve?
Well, there are to reasons.
First one is curiosity. I ran into a bug in our application, and for
some moment I thought i
Just to rule it out, are you calling this.base(arguments) in the
constructor for each of your classes?
Loïc Bresson -- Novlog wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to understand how the ObjectRegistry works.
> I was thinking that every instantiated object was registered into the
> ObjectRegistry when it
I have no experience whatsoever integrating qooxdoo with Komodo (I
briefly tried the editor once, that's all), and I haven't heard of
anybody using it that way. Does Komodo offer some kind of API to plug-in
specific language support?
T.
Andreas G. wrote:
> hello guys!
>
> is there any way to g
Counter question: Why do you need to know? Most people get along just
fine, without ever worrying about the object registry. What do you want
to achieve?
T.
Loïc Bresson -- Novlog wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm trying to understand how the ObjectRegistry works.
> I was thinking that every instantiated ob
Read this: http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/0.8/classes#instance_members
T.
Loïc Bresson -- Novlog wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a class that basically looks like this:
>
> qx.Class.define("EditorWindow", {
>...
>members: {
> dataPanes: [],
> ...
>}
> });
>
> The member dataPanes
FYI -- this e-book contains a wealth of information on optimizing JavaScript:
http://javascriptrocks.com/performance/
I'm not affiliated with the authors, but I've read it and can recommend it
wholeheartedly.
Dave
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Some-for-loop-optimizat
Hi.
I have a class that basically looks like this:
qx.Class.define("EditorWindow", {
...
members: {
dataPanes: [],
...
}
});
The member dataPanes is an array that I use to store widgets that I
don't want to instantiate several times. If the widget I need doesn't
exist in the
Hi.
I'm trying to understand how the ObjectRegistry works.
I was thinking that every instantiated object was registered into the
ObjectRegistry when it was created. However, I noticed recently that
objects of some of my classes were not in the registry (when I try to
get their hashcode, I get "
Hi everyone,
I'm new to Qooxdoo, Javascript, and all of this (getting up to speed quickly
though!) But in my former life I was a console videogame developer for
about a decade, so I thought I'd chime in here on the loop optimization.
For loop optimizations: don't worry about it unless you need
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:38, Chirag Patel wrote:
> Hello Derrell,
>
> Can you please let me know if this is possible?
> To me it looks like it is not possible with the existing renderer and
> model classes.
>
I think I already answered this with:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:11, Chirag Patel
thron7 wrote:
> "copy-files":
> {
>"=files": []
> }
> }
>
> This way, you prohibit merging "files", but still inherit other subkeys
> intact (which is what you usually want). It doesn't make a difference in
> your particular case, as you want to copy no
>>
>>
> Ok, now I get why I need the "=" in the job definition. Thanks for the
> URL :)
>
Actually, since the copy-files key carries other subkeys than "files",
you would rather block on the subkey level, than the key level itself:
"jobs" :
{
"build-files" :
{
Hey there,
received them about one week ago, no problem.
Didn't have anything to contribute though.
Maybe it's appropriate to file a bug regarding the runtime issues?
Seen them in Firefox too in a quick view.
Greetings,
Stefan
Petr Kobalíček wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Sorry for reopening this,
>
>
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, A.Yerenkow wrote:
>> Another "interesting" result:
>>
>> n = 2000;
>> var k, d=[];
>> for (k=0; k> d[d.length]=k;
>> }
>>
>> is basically as fast as
>>
>> n = 2000;
>> var d = new Array(n);
>> var t2= new Date().getTime();
>> for (k=0; k> d[k] = k;
>> }
> mayb
On 29.09.2009 13:38, Fritz Zaucker wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, A.Yerenkow wrote:
>
>
>> You could find info in internet about why is that :)
>> The javascript arrays aren't arrays at all :)
>> To see the whole picture, try reverse tests, like this:
>>
>> a) var k, n = 500;
>> var d=[
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, A.Yerenkow wrote:
> You could find info in internet about why is that :)
> The javascript arrays aren't arrays at all :)
> To see the whole picture, try reverse tests, like this:
>
> a) var k, n = 500;
> var d=[];
> for (k=n; k>0; k--) {
> d[k] = k;
> }
>
Matthew Gregory wrote:
> By default when you override a job it merges your definition with the
> orriginal definition: so
>
> the orriginal "files" : ["index.html"]
> merged with
> your "files" : []
> is still
> "files" : ["index.html"]
>
> Using the equals character you are telling the generator
Hello Derrell,
Can you please let me know if this is possible?
To me it looks like it is not possible with the existing renderer and
model classes.
Thanks
Chirag
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:30:57 +0530
> From: Chirag Patel
> Subject: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] qooxdoo-devel Digest, Vol 40, Issue 114
> T
Thanks Rob,The rows are rendered as and when needed. Also I do not want to
display sub-table all the time. The subtable should toggle each time a row
of the main table is clicked. So it is basically a kind of tree grid with
ability to have variable number of columns for main table and sub-table.
So
By default when you override a job it merges your definition with the
orriginal definition: so
the orriginal "files" : ["index.html"]
merged with
your "files" : []
is still
"files" : ["index.html"]
Using the equals character you are telling the generator to replace the
existing job rather than
Hi Guys,
Sorry for reopening this,
I sent these times two mails, one about some qooxdoo runtime issues
and one about Classic theme, were these mails received (there is no
reply until now)?
- Petr
2009/9/24 Fritz Zaucker :
> Thomas,
>
> yes, I agree that this behaviour is ok. I just found it cur
Hi Guys,
I have more interesting idea of optimization in qooxdoo, but I don't
know if it's possible to implement. Javascript is dynamic language and
everything is determined at runtime, qooxdoo has complete namespace
system (and my app too) that forces you to write code like this:
qx.Class.define
thron7 wrote:
>
> The action key run in the "build-files" job is the "copy-files" key [1].
> You can either specify copy-files/files : [] (empty list) to have
> nothing copied. Or list other files and/or directories off of the
> "source" path to be copied to the build version.
>
> T.
>
> [1]
skar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I'm using a variation of the index.html with AUTH_TOKEN variable
> to pass rails csrf checks, how do I make the build script not copy the
> index.html over to the build dir.
The action key run in the "build-files" job is the "copy-files" key [1].
You can either speci
Looking through the code, my assumption is that it has to do with
qx.event.Registration.getManager(). The event manager is chosen according to
the global "window" object (line 78). This is really tricky, because the
event target is instantiated in the parent window, and not in the child
window. I
38 matches
Mail list logo
