Hi Stefan!
> Tbanks for a splendid job "porting" qooxdoo" to the mobile/smartphone
> platform. It is well done and show that the
> architecture of qooxdoo really can be scaled down and right-sized.
Thanks for the positive feedback.
> We just finished porting to our first qooxdoo mobile webdeskt
Hi Rudriko,
I can confirm the memory issue. I've opened a report for it:
http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5129
The CPU load problem is likely due to the browser having to evaluate and
execute the response of every request as JavaScript since you're using
the Script transport.
If po
Victor,
can you run a 'generate.py info' and post the output?! Together with the
paths to the libraries (if you use any beyond the qooxdoo framework
library and the local app)?! Do libs live on different file systems?!
Networked file systems?!
T.
On 05/16/2011 04:18 PM, Victor Powell wrote:
>
I have a project thats been working fine for a while but this morning i ran:
./generate.py source
and it hangs on initialization
INITIALIZING: **
=
Hi everybody,
First of all i'd like to apologize if i'm missunderstanding things or if my
question is not correctly explained.
My need is to manage an array of items, having their own properties that are
frequently refreshed (once/s) by requesting the server for updates using
qx.ui.remote.Request
Rob makes a good point here.
In general, it's a bad idea to overwrite your check to allow more values
in the child class, because the parent class may not be able to deal
with those new values.
Allowing less values is pretty much ok, though, because the parent class
will be able to handle all
Robert Nimax wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I do not think, you can do it. Even the"refine" key of a property will
> only affect the initial value.
> You should really think about your class design. If there is a property
> of another type in the sub class you should give it another name,
> because it is a dif
Hi,
I do not think, you can do it. Even the"refine" key of a property will
only affect the initial value.
You should really think about your class design. If there is a property
of another type in the sub class you should give it another name,
because it is a different property and the semantics ar
Hi Benoît,
You could use the validate key instead of the check key. It allows you
to use a class member as validation function. You can then overwrite
that member in the child class:
qx.Class.define("ParentClass",
{
extend : qx.core.Object,
properties :
{
myProperty : {
nu
Hello,
I'm currently trying to subclass an existing class and to overwrite an
existing property to allow more possibilities. The "check" function of this
property is a problem because I can't redefine it in the subclass.
As it is impossible to completely and easily overwrite properties with qx
c
Hi,
There are no tests made I am aware of. The mobile widgets are right now working
only on android / iOS native browser.
Best regards,
Tino
Am 14.05.2011 um 14:46 schrieb Stefan Andersson:
What are your results from testing qooxdoo with both the full and the light
versions of this
http://w
hey, thanks! Now I understand more about the anonymous property.
however, my issue isn't completely solved.
I added the listener in _createChildControlIml: function (id)
I have a class A that contains a list L which uses my custom listItem,
the one that has de listener.
There's another list W. B
12 matches
Mail list logo
