Hi Qooxdoo Team!
In my application I have several warnings:
"Missing destruct definition for '$$user_tableColumnModel' in
qx.ui.table.columnmodel.resizebehavior.Default[undefined]:
qx.ui.table.columnmodel.Resize[3264-0]"
My qx.disposerDebugLevel=1.
I am right, that messages like "Missing destruc
Okay, I filed an enhancement:
http://bugzilla.qooxdoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6184
--
View this message in context:
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Table-row-header-footer-spanners-tp7341893p7342960.html
Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 14:33, Phyo Arkar wrote:
> Transport error 0: Unknown status code. Possibly due to a cross-domain
> request?
>
> I am getting this when i try to get data from Remote Table Model using
> JSONRPC.
>
> It happens when data is huge (i set blocksize to 2000) and over slow line
I am not doing cross domain for sure.
and also it works flawlessly if data returned from server is not big.
Why this happens? is there max setTimeout value ?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote:
> Transport error 0: Unknown status code. Possibly due to a cross-domain
> request?
>
It's a reasonable suggestion. I suggest creating a bugzilla "enhancement"
report and including your patch. That way Martin will look at it and
potentially schedule it in. (Pretty much all scheduling of features,
enhancements, bugs, etc., occurs from bugzilla.) Please include my initial
reply in the
The problem is the footer needs to be rather compact relative to the actual
row itself, so using more than 1 column becomes a bit icky.
And subtle things like the size of the focus indicator need to change based
on the actual cell body height, and by the time I am done overriding many
classes to m
--
View this message in context:
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Table-row-header-footer-spanners-tp7341893p7342566.html
Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Us
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 03:25, Lee Salzman wrote:
> Though one thing I did end up missing from Dojo is the extra functionality
> it's DGrid widget provides over qooxdoo's Table. In particular I was
> relying
> on spanning sub-rows to show some summary information for grid rows. I
> looked at the
MartinWittemann wrote
>
> Hm, thats not good. Do you think its worth the effort to implement it? I
> mean the modern browsers are fast enough anyway. :|
>
You're totally right. The current implementation is good enough and I also
think it's not necessary to modify the code - the speed improveme
First a digression... I have been working on a business-oriented web app
recently and initially I started with the Dojo toolkit because on the
surface it had a lot of the high-end features I needed. But after struggling
with it for a few weeks I recently Dojo kind-of/sort-of seemed to completely
fa
10 matches
Mail list logo
