Hey,
could you guys give me some feedback why you want to use it?
Regards,
Martin
Am 24.07.2013 um 12:26 schrieb d2 mailto:dc...@oxys.net>>:
The only way to do this is tu use defer. I don't particularly like it but there
is no "correct" way of doing this.
http://tinyurl.com/me3mgs7
2013/7/24
Hi Daniel,
After another distclean of our app and a new build at home, everything worked
fine!
It seems the download of the contribution was corrupt and I always get the
corrupted files from the proxy cache... really annoying!
Anyway, sorry for the noise and best regards,
Andreas
-Ursprüng
> Hi,
>
> after migration to qooxdoo 3.0, the first "generate api" throws lots of
> "Unknown '@' hint in JSDoc comment: ..." warnings!
>
> (like for 'author', 'license', 'depend')
>
> All are in .\framework\source\class\qx\dev\unit\Sinon.js
>
> To reproduce:
> #> generate distclean && generate api
I seem to be having problems loading images in 3.0. I have a fairly simple
app called todo which resides in /var/www/qx/todo and it uses the sdk in
/var/www/qooxdoo/qooxdoo-3.0-sdk.
Inside of the Application.js file is @asset(todo/*) along with
var newButton = new qx.ui.toolbar.Button(this.tr("A
Hi,
after migration to qooxdoo 3.0, the first "generate api" throws lots of
"Unknown '@' hint in JSDoc comment: ..." warnings!
(like for 'author', 'license', 'depend')
All are in .\framework\source\class\qx\dev\unit\Sinon.js
To reproduce:
#> generate distclean && generate api
Can we 'silence'
Hi Andreas,
I couldn't reproduce the problem with a fresh 3.0 skeleton app. Could
you please try the same?
Regards,
Daniel
On 24.07.2013 14:25, Fink, Andreas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to migrate our app to qooxdoo 3.0. After changing the path settings,
> running the migration job and done the
Hi all,
I try to migrate our app to qooxdoo 3.0. After changing the path settings,
running the migration job and done the manual code applies mentioned in the
migtaion doc, I've tried to run the generate source job. This ends up with some
warnings like "Unknown global symbol used: com.zenesis.q
The only way to do this is tu use defer. I don't particularly like it but
there is no "correct" way of doing this.
http://tinyurl.com/me3mgs7
2013/7/24 David Charbonnier
> The only way to do this is tu use defer. I don't particularly like it but
> there is no "correct" way of doing this.
> http
Ah OK! It does NOT work:
http://tinyurl.com/lghqsr9
Am 24.07.2013 11:55, schrieb Dietrich Streifert:
> Hey John!
>
> Yes I know that. Having an override-able applier is an alternative
> solution for this.
>
> But my question was simply if the code below would work or not:
Hey John!
Yes I know that. Having an override-able applier is an alternative
solution for this.
But my question was simply if the code below would work or not:
> Having a class 'Basic' with property foo and generated getter getFoo
> and setter setFoo:
>
> If I derive class 'Advanced' from cla
You can if the Basic class has an apply method that isn't private, which
your Advanced class can override.
John
On 24/07/2013 10:40, "Dietrich Streifert"
wrote:
>Hey everybody,
>
>just to understand this right:
>
>Having a class 'Basic' with property foo and generated getter getFoo and
>setter
Hey everybody,
just to understand this right:
Having a class 'Basic' with property foo and generated getter getFoo and
setter setFoo:
If I derive class 'Advanced' from class 'Basic': Is it possible to
override the method setFoo of 'Basic'?
Code fragment:
setFoo: function(value) {
Hey,
I don't understand, do you mean that we can't now overwrite getter, setter,
resetter for qooxdoo properties in defer ?
Well, you can do whatever you want in the defer as you have access to the JS
object which holds the functions. Sure that could be done but was never
supported and we don't
Hi,
2013/7/24 MartinWittemann [via qooxdoo] <
ml-node+s678n7584193...@n2.nabble.com>
>
>
> Overriding one of the generated methods usually breaks all others. If we
> override the setter, the getter will always return wrong values because the
> generated setter can not be used anymore. If you want
Hi devs,
when I disable a parent component, I can still see child component enabled,
is that the expected behavior?
See the snippet:
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/devel/playground/#%7B%22code%22%3A%22var%2520doc%2520%253D%2520this.getRoot()%253B%250A%250Avar%2520composite%2520%253D%2520new%2520qx.ui.c
Hi,
the icon behavior does not change with qx.ui.form.DateField .
Furthermore expected custom behavior is not shown even if no javascript
error occours in the constructor.
Here is my custom DateField
qx.Class.define("vvftools.DateField",
{
extend : qx.ui.form.DateField,
construct : functio
Hey,
> Why should that be a problem at all? Overwriting method 'A' doesn't force
> anyone to overwrite method 'B' as well!
> Those (generated) methods 'setFoo', 'getFoo' (and 'isFoo') are public methods.
> You can override any public method! And you should be able to do so with the
> generated one
Hi Matteo
The second parameter to com.zenesis.qx.upload.UploadMgr is the URL to a
server page that handles the upload, and would be the same as what you
would normally put in the "action" attribute of a form.
For example, this HTML code:
[ ... snip ... ]
Becomes:
> [...]
>> We have been overriding generated methods such as “isValid”, “setValid” etc,
>> until version 3.0 that does not let us to use these method. Please, is there
>> a way to use Qx 3.0 without this validation?
> No, there is no way to disable that check except rewriting / removing the
> chec
19 matches
Mail list logo
