Congratulations!
Fritz
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Gregory Beaver wrote:
It suddenly occurred to me this evening, well after I had given up and erased
my code, that there is a simple and elegant solution to my problems with
using a single qx.ui.list.List and swapping the model to avoid all the
head
It suddenly occurred
to me this evening, well after I had given up and
erased my code, that there is a simple and elegant solution to my
problems with using a single qx.ui.list.List and swapping the model to
avoid all the headaches with incorrect selection:
qx.ui.container.Stack
So, I whipped
Very true, and duly noted. Always better to work with a single selection
model.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:58 AM, rsantiagopaz wrote:
> warning, because if you use setSelection for set other arrays, if you add
> listeners previously (like this code below), the events lost.
>
> var list = new qx
warning, because if you use setSelection for set other arrays, if you add
listeners previously (like this code below), the events lost.
var list = new qx.ui.list.List(model);
//Pre-Select "Item No 20"
list.getSelection().push(model.getItem(20));
//log selection changes
list.getSelection().addLis
http://tinyurl.com/pqvzhmt
Perfecto. So easy!. ...Sometimes the brain is blocked..
--
View this message in context:
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/question-about-problem-with-command-and-table-tp7584482p7584506.html
Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Correct. The selection model is looking for an array, not an object. So,
setSelection([a.getItem(0))]) would also work.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:27 AM, rsantiagopaz wrote:
> use this Gregory
> list.getSelection().push(a.getItem(0));
> instead of
> list.setSelection(a.getItem(0));
>
> or
thanks for your time Wagner. This is the most important question, I need
resolve somehow.
--
View this message in context:
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/question-about-a-mobile-project-behavior-tp7584484p7584504.html
Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
use this Gregory
list.getSelection().push(a.getItem(0));
instead of
list.setSelection(a.getItem(0));
or list.getSelection().removeAll() for no selection
--
View this message in context:
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/stuck-with-qx-ui-list-List-tp7584489p7584503.html
Sent from the qooxdoo m
Just a thought for when you get back to it then is there a chance that two
bits of code were trying to change the model(s) at the same time? I have
had something similar where recursive binding can cause conflicts and the
wrong things get added/removed - e.g. An event changes the model which
cau
Are you using the binding mechanism? There are occasions where the binding
can be a pain with selections, particularly in cases where the selection can
become empty and there is a whole tree of bound widgets; while binding knows
how to apply a value, I often find I have to handle empty selection
s
On 08/29/2013 10:28 AM, benco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having some problems dealing with a custom config.json.
>
> I plan to use qx.core.Environment outside of a qooxdoo app and I was
> planning to create a custom Bootstrap that extend this class by removing the
> "qx.*" keys (except the mandatory one
Ack! Accidentally clicked send.
I have a database of composers, the pieces they wrote and the movements of
those pieces. It is sent to qooxdoo as Json, and using a Json marshal made
into 3 classes. The kids property in composers stores the array of pieces,
and the same is true for the kids prop
Thank you all for the quick feedback. A few responses:
1) the prettify feature in chrome was a new one and will make debugging the
generated accessors possible, one problem solved
2) I debug in source mode, sorry that was not explicit. I am not a
masochist in that way :)
3) although I was trying
Hi,
I'm having some problems dealing with a custom config.json.
I plan to use qx.core.Environment outside of a qooxdoo app and I was
planning to create a custom Bootstrap that extend this class by removing the
"qx.*" keys (except the mandatory ones qx.debug) just to have a really small
final "bui
Greg,
thanks for you feedback.
On 08/29/2013 06:04 AM, Gregory Beaver wrote:
> Dear qooxdoo,
>
> I wrote a very complicated application based on qooxdoo a few years
> ago. It still works great but there are some kinks that I was trying
> to work out. I spent 13 hours over the past week trying
Sorry for not having already post a replay... I'm preparing a little bundle
to reproduce the problem, but I need also to work on my project... so I hope
to post all you need asap!
Thx in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/Messed-up-responses-while-doing-x
Hi Greg,
I tried to run your code but this line:
list.setSelection(a.getItem(0));
threw an exception because the selection expects an instance of
qx.data.Array but getItem returns a number. After replacing it with
slice(0, 1), everything works as expected:
http://tinyurl.com/ntuyyrp
FYI, the
17 matches
Mail list logo
