Hi Jim and others,
let me add a few remarks so that people don't get confused about layout
managers.
Of course, qooxdoo allows you to position widgets with absolute
coordinates. Nothing's really gonna change here for 0.8. For absolute
positioning there has always been a layout manager, either imp
Jim Hunter schrieb:
> I guess you think I want an application that simply looks like 'a'
> Windows application, no, I need it to look exactly (translated means
> the exact same control placement, size, etc) as our current Windows
> application. With the current .7.x version of qooxdoo, I can eas
I guess you think I want an application that simply looks like 'a' Windows
application, no, I need it to look exactly (translated means the exact same
control placement, size, etc) as our current Windows application. With the
current .7.x version of qooxdoo, I can easily do that because when I crea
Hi Jim,
I not really understand what you means with "Perhaps if I was creating a
'web page' I would want things to layout on their own, but I am creating
an application that needs exact positioning" since most modern desktop
ui systems also base on layout managers, that is not web or qooxdoo
s
I can tell you that for the work I do, I want to absolutely place almost
everything. There are only a few instances right now where I let things "go
where they may". My app needs to 'look' just like our Windows app, and to do
that, I need to place controls at the precise coordinates. And my control
Thomas,
we want to layout widgets manually. Like one would do with a
CanvasLayout in 0.7.
Cheers,
Rüdiger
thron7 wrote:
> Ruediger,
>
> just to clarify things: Do you want a situation where you can position a
> child in a widget with absolute coordinates, and then all other childs
> get autom
Ruediger,
just to clarify things: Do you want a situation where you can position a
child in a widget with absolute coordinates, and then all other childs
get automatically adjusted by the layout manager (as far as this is
possible), or do you want to do all layouting directly so there is no
auto-l
Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
> Hi Fabian,
>
> sorry for the delayed answer, we have been away for EclipseCon.
> Please see my comments below.
>
> Cheers,
> Rüdiger
>
> Fabian Jakobs wrote:
>
>> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
>>
>>> Hi Fabian,
>>>
>>> I found one more thing that I really like about
Hi Fabian,
sorry for the delayed answer, we have been away for EclipseCon.
Please see my comments below.
Cheers,
Rüdiger
Fabian Jakobs wrote:
> Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
>> Hi Fabian,
>>
>> I found one more thing that I really like about 0.8. The separation
>> in a layer that handles browser-sp
Rüdiger Herrmann schrieb:
> Hi Fabian,
>
> I found one more thing that I really like about 0.8. The separation
> in a layer that handles browser-specific issues and a high-level
> widget set that is based on the former.
> If only the layout system weren't that hard to use (if ever)...
> please s
Hi Fabian,
I found one more thing that I really like about 0.8. The separation
in a layer that handles browser-specific issues and a high-level
widget set that is based on the former.
If only the layout system weren't that hard to use (if ever)...
please see my comments inlined.
Cheers,
Rüdige
Leander Hanwald schrieb:
> Hi Rüdiger,
>
> nice text, thank you. That is very interessting for everyone who hasn't
> testet the devel code of 0.8 so far.
>
> I understand what you mean, the code is now much longer, especially the
> long functionname "setLayoutProperty" seems to be a little bit
>
Hi Rüdiger,
nice text, thank you. That is very interessting for everyone who hasn't
testet the devel code of 0.8 so far.
I understand what you mean, the code is now much longer, especially the
long functionname "setLayoutProperty" seems to be a little bit
out-of-place, also the code is a littl
Hi Rüdiger,
thank you for your feedback. I think you are one of the first using the
0.8 widgets. Your feedback is very helpful because you can look at it
from a different point of view. Please keep us up to date :-)
> Hi all,
>
> I just started experimenting with 0.8, and found things that I li
Hi all,
I just started experimenting with 0.8, and found things that I like
and some that I don't like, which I would like to share here.
* a great achievement is, that no widget property relies on
the widget being realized (i.e. the DOM node was created).
We will happily remove all those "
15 matches
Mail list logo
