Derrell Lipman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mansay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi. I can understand your preference to have the extra header added by
> Request. We're actually, though, trying to reduce network traffic and
> have
> looked at removing various headers that nee
Mansay wrote:
>
> Latest code of this class include this comment:
> "// TODO do we really need these header? (fj)"
>
I believe this comment has to do with bug 1019, where the extra HTTP header
is seen as a relevant overhead, specially when your smart client performs
many quick small server ca
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mansay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Latest code of this class include this comment:
> "// TODO do we really need these header? (fj)"
>
> Well, for me a little tweak of this header allow me to gain Rails
> recognition of ajax calls,
> and so generate a co
Hello,
Latest code of this class include this comment:
"// TODO do we really need these header? (fj)"
Well, for me a little tweak of this header allow me to gain Rails recognition
of ajax calls,
and so generate a complete and clean QooXDoo/Rails RIA.
Maybe it could be the case for other frame
