Thanks. :)
Am 14.07.2011 um 14:01 schrieb Benjamin Dreux:
> Here is the bug report id : Bug 5402
>
> 2011/7/14 Martin Wittemann :
>> Hey,
>> don't see a reason why we shouldn't add it so go ahead and open up an issue
>> report. I'll take care of that.
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> Am 13.07.2
Here is the bug report id : Bug 5402
2011/7/14 Martin Wittemann :
> Hey,
> don't see a reason why we shouldn't add it so go ahead and open up an issue
> report. I'll take care of that.
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
> Am 13.07.2011 um 14:04 schrieb Benjamin Dreux:
>
>> Hi
>> Before filling a enhancement
Hey,
don't see a reason why we shouldn't add it so go ahead and open up an issue
report. I'll take care of that.
Regards,
Martin
Am 13.07.2011 um 14:04 schrieb Benjamin Dreux:
> Hi
> Before filling a enhancement request
> I want to be sure that me idea is good, and well formulled.
>
> I was lo
On 07/13/2011 03:27 PM, Benjamin Dreux wrote:
> For this one, it is already in the qx.type.BaseArray, and by
> inheritance, it is in the qx.type.Array
Of course. I knew that!
*cough*
--
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for
For this one, it is already in the qx.type.BaseArray, and by
inheritance, it is in the qx.type.Array
2011/7/13 Marc Puts :
> +1
> I like the idea, and can see this being used a lot. :)
>
> To take it one step further, why not introduce a filter method as well,
> which would return an array contain
+1
I like the idea, and can see this being used a lot. :)
To take it one step further, why not introduce a filter method as well,
which would return an array containing all the 'found' elements.
Regards,
Marc
On 07/13/2011 02:04 PM, Benjamin Dreux wrote:
> Hi
> Before filling a enhancement req
Hi
Before filling a enhancement request
I want to be sure that me idea is good, and well formulled.
I was looking at the qx.type.Array api, and i'm wondering why there is
no find function.
This function would be like filter, but find just the first item that
when passed to the callback return true
