Forget about the last explanation,
In fact the correct solution is to derive the abstract object from
qx.core.object
Regards
2011/6/3 Benjamin Dreux
> Sorry
> in fact i had an abstract class with statics memebers.
> On of the static memeber create return an object from a type derived from
> th
Sorry
in fact i had an abstract class with statics memebers.
On of the static memeber create return an object from a type derived from
the first class.
And when i went to see,in the concreate object , the members defined in the
abstract class, the memebers just not exist.
The problem was that i
Hi Benjamin,
Yes, this is perfectly possible. Otherwise there wouldn't be much use
for creating abstract classes. :)
Marc
On 06/03/2011 03:46 PM, Benjamin Dreux wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to have a key "members" in an abstract class (class A
> with member : m() ).
> Then derive this class
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 09:46, Benjamin Dreux wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to have a key "members" in an abstract class (class A with
> member : m() ).
> Then derive this class (new class B), and then use the members defined in
> the abstract class ( B.m() ) ??
>
Absolutely. That's a very commo
Sorry for this question, i've found an exemple here :
https://github.com/qooxdoo/qooxdoo/blob/master/qooxdoo/framework/source/class/qx/ui/layout/Abstract.js
So yes it's possible.
2011/6/3 Benjamin Dreux
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to have a key "members" in an abstract class (class A with
> member
Hi
Is it possible to have a key "members" in an abstract class (class A with
member : m() ).
Then derive this class (new class B), and then use the members defined in
the abstract class ( B.m() ) ??
Regards
--
Benjamin Dreux
Analyste-Programmeur
Chaire de logiciel libre-Finance Social et solid
