Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Packer : a JavaScript compressor/obfuscator

2007-02-19 Thread Hugh Gibson
> And this each time. In this case it is > better to leave it to real, directly executable JavaScript IMHO. I agree. When applying gzip I'm getting 80% compression of the qooxdoo-compressed script, with a download of just 159k. We have proper cache control in our server, and so the client just

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Packer : a JavaScript compressor/obfuscator

2007-02-19 Thread Sebastian Werner
The problem with Dean Edwards packer is that it unpacks using JavaScript and some "eval" magic. I don't think it is a good idea, because it dramatically reduces the load performance of large javascript applications. And this each time. In this case it is better to leave it to real, directly

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Packer : a JavaScript compressor/obfuscator

2007-02-19 Thread frederic
Hi Fabian, No idea how to works your function. Packer seems very efficient. "make build" on frontend/application/sample generate a file sample.js of 1004kb. After using Packer on this file, the size becomes 576kb. The demo is not broken ! And after using gzip on this "Packed" file, the size becom

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Packer : a JavaScript compressor/obfuscator

2007-02-19 Thread Fabian Jakobs
frederic schrieb: > Hello, > You can obfuscate your JS code with this tool : > http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2006/12/packer-php/ > A Python version seems working, have you planned to integrate this feature > in Qooxdoo ? > The original script is under LGPL > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/LG

[qooxdoo-devel] Packer : a JavaScript compressor/obfuscator

2007-02-18 Thread frederic
Hello, You can obfuscate your JS code with this tool : http://dean.edwards.name/weblog/2006/12/packer-php/ A Python version seems working, have you planned to integrate this feature in Qooxdoo ? The original script is under LGPL http://creativecommons.org/licenses/LGPL/2.1/ best regards. frederic