Thanks, I will check that way.
From: John Spackman
To: pragnesh patel ; qooxdoo Development
Sent: Tuesday, 1 September 2015 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] performance issue with IE only
Without more information it’s difficult to make suggestions, but I think I’d
start by
nesh patel, qooxdoo Development
Date: Tuesday, 1 September 2015 13:21
To: "qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Subject: [qooxdoo-devel] performance issue with IE only
Hi,
We have one large application and we have created many customize components
using qooxdoo library.
IS
Hi,
We have one large application and we have created many customize components
using qooxdoo library.
ISSUE:
When we run the application in IE, after some time (specifically speaking after
12 to 15 mins) the application becomes very slow.After slowness, If I run
CLTR+F5 command, it gets its sp
>>
>>Please can this be reviewed for inclusion in the trunk? Here's the patch
>> on
>> github (is this a pull request??)
>>
>>https://github.com/johnspackman/qooxdoo/commit/0c7864e53316a150bbe4ebec5d
>>eec
>> 488020e2f48
>
>Not quite :-). But if you look at the commit page, in the upper right
>co
> Please can this be reviewed for inclusion in the trunk? Here's the patch
> on
> github (is this a pull request??)
> https://github.com/johnspackman/qooxdoo/commit/0c7864e53316a150bbe4ebec5deec
> 488020e2f48
Not quite :-). But if you look at the commit page, in the upper right
corner, right besi
Hi
I've been trying to profile my app and found that there is a surprising
amount of activity caused by qx.event.Idle if I start my app, wait 10
seconds, and then run the Firebug profiler for the next 10 seconds I get
9,000 function calls logged and 13.9% of the time profiled is spent in
qx.even
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Alexander Steitz wrote:
> Hi Fritz,
>
> On Monday 24 October 2011 16:21:54 Fritz Zaucker wrote:
>> I am wondering (in a not totally theoretical context):
>>
>> If I have two Qooxdoo-applications, one implemented as
>> qx.application.Standalone, one implemeted as qx.application
Hi Fritz,
On Monday 24 October 2011 16:21:54 Fritz Zaucker wrote:
> I am wondering (in a not totally theoretical context):
>
> If I have two Qooxdoo-applications, one implemented as
> qx.application.Standalone, one implemeted as qx.application.Inline and
> apart from that identical, what are the
Hi,
I am wondering (in a not totally theoretical context):
If I have two Qooxdoo-applications, one implemented as
qx.application.Standalone, one implemeted as qx.application.Inline and apart
from that identical, what are the performance impacts?
E.g., does the inline appplication have to do sign
How did you put that file online ?
Is it behind a Tomcat or any other web container ?
If yes, this would serve the file dynamically while it doesn't change.
Do prefer a web server (apache for eg) since that ressource is static, this
will be a lot faster.
Also, enable gz compression is another ver
For me it seems that your server has really long response times.
Otherwise it's pretty fast loading. Using the Webkit Inspector I got a
latency of 8-10 seconds for mapapp.js. This is reproducable every time
I clear the cache and reload the app.
Most qooxdoo apps otherwise have loading times under
W&L Regionalberatung - Administration wrote:
> Can you give me please some advice how to improve loading?
hi,
the official recommendation in this case is to look here:
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/current/apiviewer/#qx.ui.progressive
hope it helps
burak
-
Hello,
Why not Gzip your js file - if your server can manage it of course ?
Best,
Benoît.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-Problem-tp4479328p4479480.html
Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Hello,
users complain about my qooxdoo-app's long loading time (whitescreen over
10sec, especially the very first time launching my "mapapp"). .
Please have a look at my app:
http://www2.komsis.at/administration/mapapp/build/index.html?gid=154&breite=850&hoehe=650&view=listekarte
The js-file o
Hello John,
most of the time, the bottleneck in performance is creating the widgets. So
if you have that huge number of widgets, it would be a good idea to start of
with creating the widgets on demand. So just create the widgets shown on the
first tab page. If another tab is clicked, create these
Hi guys,
We have an app with a tabview that has 12 pages and approx 300-400 controls
(plus labels), everything from simple text fields to a dozen or so tables;
while this is ok in FF35 (albeit a little slow to start up) not surprisingly
performance is poor in IE and even in IE8 you always get t
Hi,
I made some profiling in the demo and it seems that your suggestion of
creating the rawData array is really faster (1.68 ms) than the current
implementation (1.76 ms). The creation of the data array takes a lot
more time (17.474 ms).
But all of these times are not really a problem compar
Hi,
when trying
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/current/demobrowser/#data~SearchAsYouType.html
and changing the code to use an array of 600 elements instead of the 60
elements in the example, the code runs VERY slowly.
It seems, that both
var rawData = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 600 i++)
ieto
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:30 +0300
> From: Burak Arslan
> Subject: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Performance in different browsers
> To: qooxdoo Development
> Message-ID: <4a6035f2.9020...@arskom.com.tr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8
optimisation techniques'.
S pozdravem / Best regards,
Monika Falk, Software Specialist
Tieto
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:30 +0300
From: Burak Arslan
Subject: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Performance in different browsers
To: qooxdoo Development
Message-ID: <4a6035f2.9020...@arskom.com.tr&
monika.f...@tieto.com wrote:
Hi Everyone
I want to ask how fast is your qooxdoo app in different browsers? Is
there a huge difference between IE an for example FF?
qooxdoo seems to be among the fastest. see:
http://dante.dojotoolkit.org/taskspeed/
hope it helps
burak
---
Hi Everyone
I want to ask how fast is your qooxdoo app in different browsers? Is there a
huge difference between IE an for example FF?
S pozdravem / Best regards,
Monika Falk, Software Specialist
Tieto
email monika.f...@tieto.com, direct +420597459905, fax +420597459928
Výstavní 292/13, 70200
Hi Torsten,
> Hi Fabian,
>
> I would post all to the list, but it is quiet a lot.
> Is it possible to send an attachment ?
> In the meanwhile I send it to your office.
>
from a quick look at your code I see one significant difference. In the
version you sent to me you have optimized the "paint"
Hi Fabian,
I would post all to the list, but it is quiet a lot.
Is it possible to send an attachment ?
In the meanwhile I send it to your office.
Thank you
Torsten
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the brow
PilotBlankenfelde schrieb:
> Hi Fabian,
>
> may I send you the original html/js (as zip) for comparison ?
>
Sure,
you can send it to my office mail address if you don't want to post it
in the list.
Best Fabian
--
Fabian Jakobs
JavaScript Framework Developer
1&1 Internet AG
Brauerstraße 4
Hi Fabian,
may I send you the original html/js (as zip) for comparison ?
Thank you
Torsten
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can us
Hi Torsten,
I've profiled your code and it looks like 80% of the run time is spend
in the method "embed.setHtml(html)...". This method is nothing more than
a thin wrapper for "element.innerHTML = html". Since the HTML string is
really large (about 10 characters) the browser parsing and rend
Hello,
I'm new to qooxdoo and try to get include a html/js solution to qx.
How it work:
a timer starts the following process:
1) compute an array of numbers
2) create a div element for each number
3) apply all these computed div's to one parent element
See below the implementation of my tr
On 26 Nov 2008, at 10:06, Fritz Zaucker wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Burak Arslan wrote:
>
>> first, we're not straying too much off-topic, are we? if so please
>> tell.
>
> Another (border line) comment:
>
> Adding additional components to a system (SW or HW) will in general
> decrease
> th
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Burak Arslan wrote:
> first, we're not straying too much off-topic, are we? if so please tell.
Another (border line) comment:
Adding additional components to a system (SW or HW) will in general decrease
the reliability, as it will add additional bugs and ways for failure.
A
Hey :)
first, we're not straying too much off-topic, are we? if so please tell.
Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog wrote:
This is different problems : performance and scallability in one hand
and reliability in one another.
well, i'm against this school because reliability has first-degree
ef
Hi again ;-)
On 24 Nov 2008, at 22:09, Burak Arslan wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog wrote:
>> (
>> The architecture I have in mind and that I should have described to
>> be
>> clear is the following :
>> 1 load balancer : the backend entry point for all incomming HTTP
>> request.
>> * se
Hi Jim,
can you specify your hardware ?
I'm developing quite complex application. I'm not using object pooling
and performance is very good for me (1.6Ghz, qx0.7.3). Performance
killer can be for example too many items in tree, etc:)
Regards
- Petr
2008/8/19 Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Th
Thanks, I'l let you know if I can find any way to squeeze more speed out of
the IE7 beast.
Thanks,
Jim
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> Firefox 2 and IE7 were nearly on the same performance level (with the
> performance tweaks applied thro
Jim,
Firefox 2 and IE7 were nearly on the same performance level (with the
performance tweaks applied through the generator). With the release of
Firefox 3 things have changed. Firefox 3 is about 3-4 times faster in
most JavaScript operations compared to Firefox 2. This means that IE7
may
Has anyone seen a huge difference in performance between FireFox 3 and IE7?
I finally got my application running fast on FF3 and was very excited but
when I tested it on IE7 it was much slower. On my test computer, a certain
page I have loads and renders in FireFox 3 in 5 seconds (it is around 1
se
Tobias Koller (GERMO GmbH) schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found out ( I guess like all of you;) ) that the performance of IE6
> is very bad.
>
> Is there a way to get better performance out of IE6? What is IE6’s
> problem?
>
> Is the performance of the new IE7 better? Comparable to FireFox?
>
> I’m not a
oxdoo Development
Betreff: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] performance IE6 + IE7
Before rejoicing you might check the memory imprint of IE7.
IE7 leaks huge amounts of memory. FF is at least 100 times better than
IE7.
- Original Message
From: Tobias Koller (GERMO GmbH) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ct: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] performance IE6 + IE7
I installed „multiple_IE“
and it works very good!
In IE7, my
application is so much faster…maybe faster than FF.
I hate IE6 ;)
Tobias
Von:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftr
nt
Betreff: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] performance IE6 + IE7
MS solution for this case is to run virtualization:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/11/30/ie6-and-ie7-running-on-a-sin
gle-machine.aspx
They should release soon a new VPC image as old one expires in a few
days.
asaris
Matthias Hellri
try this one: http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE
I'm not able to install IE7 right now ( IE6 + IE7 cannot be installed on
the same machine).
Thanks
Tobias
-
This SF.net email is spon
MS solution for this case is to run virtualization:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/11/30/ie6-and-ie7-running-on-a-single-machine.aspx
They should release soon a new VPC image as old one expires in a few
days.
asaris
Matthias Hellriegel wrote:
try this one: http://tredosof
Hi,
I found out ( I guess like all of you;) ) that the performance of IE6 is
very bad.
Is there a way to get better performance out of IE6? What is IE6's
problem?
Is the performance of the new IE7 better? Comparable to FireFox?
I'm not able to install IE7 right now ( IE6 + IE7 cannot b
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:43 AM
To: qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [qooxdoo-devel] Performance for Table
Using Qooxdoo 0.7 we are encountering performance problems on
large tables with a higher number of
Using Qooxdoo 0.7 we are encountering performance problems on large tables
with a higher number of cols.
The table-widget is undesirable slow using it with a larger number of cols.
Operating on a table with ~ 30 rows using a page-size of 50 results into a
huge DIV-structure with a few thousand
Hello,
i have some question about programming with qooxdoo.
Maybe some of you could help me :)
I need to know some "best practices" ;)
My questions are based on a simple test-project I created.
on the left of my screen is a FullControlTree-Widget (width:200,
height:"100%") and the rest i
set() is a wrapper around the setPropName functions. This means that is
is slower by nature - but I don't know directly how much slower. The
translation from the lowercase propertyName eg. width => setWidth could
be the major performance impact of the setter.
Sebastian
Dietrich Streifert schr
Hello List,
I have a big widget stack with more than 120 input widgets (textfields,
radiobuttons,comboboxes,checkboxes).
Currently all properties which can not be set at instatiation time are
set using the set method:
instance1.set({top:10,left:10,width:100,height:20,prop1:"val1",prop2:"v
> The new properties are not yet ready. The development of them
> continue next week. Following our current plan they will be part of
> 0.7. The current property are not the fastest solution in some cases.
> The new system will try to enhance the performance of the property by
> a great extend.
The part which is done - the OO system itself, namely qx.Class.define is
not directly faster. It includes more and much more powerful features
like interfaces and mixins. This is the major ascect of the new OO system.
The new properties are not yet ready. The development of them continue
next w
Hello List
has anyone tested the performance impact of the new OO system in 0.7?
As I remember correctly one of the goals was to improve performance of
the property system which seems to be rewritten from the ground.
Thank you for your comments.
Best regards..
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Diet
Table widget is only in qooxdoo 0.6 verison. Just see the online
examples(Table 1)
Cheers
alex.d
Have you tried the new qx.ui.table.Table?
I haven't compared timings with ListView, becasue I use always the Table
component.
It is prepared to load data on the fly.
I didn't fin
> Have you tried the new qx.ui.table.Table?
> I haven't compared timings with ListView, becasue I use always the Table
> component.
> It is prepared to load data on the fly.
I didn't find this Table component you mentioned. Can you provide a
small example of how this should be used? Or, direct me
Now it works for me as well. Maybe I was a bit too quick ? :-)
-Chris
> It loads OK for me under FF 1.5
>
>
> Chris Banford wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Tried to view both your main app, and the reduced test version, but
>> Firefox just spins (loading the page). No Javascript timeout error or
Have you tried the new qx.ui.table.Table?
I haven't compared timings with ListView, becasue I use always the Table
component.
It is prepared to load data on the fly.
Robert-85 wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> We are using Qooxdoo to build a Personal Information Manager (PIM).
> You can see how it
It loads OK for me under FF 1.5
Chris Banford wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Tried to view both your main app, and the reduced test version, but
> Firefox just spins (loading the page). No Javascript timeout error or
> anything, but neither link actually ran or displayed anything...
>
> -Chris
>
Hi Robert,
Tried to view both your main app, and the reduced test version, but
Firefox just spins (loading the page). No Javascript timeout error or
anything, but neither link actually ran or displayed anything...
-Chris
> Hello all,
>
> We are using Qooxdoo to build a Personal Information Man
Hello all,
We are using Qooxdoo to build a Personal Information Manager (PIM).
You can see how it looks now:
http://www.publicpim.org/ria/php/new.php
We got pretty far with the development, and now time is to focus on
performance. Enabled the debugger, and managed to increase the speed
in some
> In any case, the original article is a post to the IEBlog from Peter
> Gurevich, Performance PM for IE7:
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/08/28/728654.aspx
See comment from Tino reference: "Friday, September 01, 2006 7:17 PM by Tino
Zijdel" - shows that some of the tricks don't actua
Thanks a lot.
It is really useful article.
Best Regards,
alex.d
Hello,
On 9/6/06, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, IE does not work as nicely as all the rest of the browsers. I don't
know why this is and I can't tell you if it's going to change any time soon.
I have trie
Howdy!
Jose Leon wrote:
> Maybe the directions pointed on this article could be useful to
> improve IE performance.
>
> http://www.ajaxpath.com/javascript-performance
Apparently, no information on the authors or any credit is given for
_any_ of the articles at http://www.ajaxpath.com/. In legal
That was a very informative article. I will apply it's recommendations to my code first to see if I can get more speed, then look to see if there are any places in the source that could use improvement (not that I expect the source code to have many problems in this respect).
Thanks,JimOn 9/10/06,
Hello,
On 9/6/06, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, IE does not work as nicely as all the rest of the browsers. I don't
> know why this is and I can't tell you if it's going to change any time soon.
> I have tried qooxdoo in IE 7 and I don't see much of an improvement.
Maybe the directio
Hi,
In addition IE is the most buggy and used browser.
I develop first with FF (I have better debugging and development tools like
FireBug) and then check to see how it works with IE.
Jim Hunter-2 wrote:
>
> Yes, IE does not work as nicely as all the rest of the browsers. I don't
> know why th
Yes, IE does not work as nicely as all the rest of the browsers. I don't know why this is and I can't tell you if it's going to change any time soon. I have tried qooxdoo in IE 7 and I don't see much of an improvement.
JimOn 9/6/06, Jose Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, Is there serious per
Hello,
Is there serious performance differences between IE and Firefox, in
my case, Firefox runs smooth as hell, while IE is sluggish.
I'm working with the Tree, adding nodes at runtime when clicking a
button and I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or this is the
way it should work.
Regar
66 matches
Mail list logo
