Well, then I guess I will have to wait for it. I have an idea for pooling
the tables, I'll post it if I get it working.
Jim
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Fabian Jakobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> > For my app this is not feasible as I have no idea what the max number
> > of col
Hi Jim,
> For my app this is not feasible as I have no idea what the max number
> of columns used would be, it's all user defined. I would logically
> think that no more then 50 would be used but I recently saw an
> instance that had over 100 columns. So I am not sure if it would be
> practica
For my app this is not feasible as I have no idea what the max number of
columns used would be, it's all user defined. I would logically think that
no more then 50 would be used but I recently saw an instance that had over
100 columns. So I am not sure if it would be practical to create all column
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But are you able to change the column models properties? I would need to
> have it associate with a new set of columns for the new use. I thought that
> was not possible. I never know from one instance of a table to the next
But are you able to change the column models properties? I would need to
have it associate with a new set of columns for the new use. I thought that
was not possible. I never know from one instance of a table to the next what
column information it will need.
Jim
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:02 AM,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you are thinking that if I have a pool for the column models and a pool
> for the tables, and for each re-use of the table I just re-associate the
> model with the table it 'should' work?
Not quite. Once you associate a
Yes, it was the table column model that I was thinking about, not the table
model, thanks for correcting me.
So you are thinking that if I have a pool for the column models and a pool
for the tables, and for each re-use of the table I just re-associate the
model with the table it 'should' work? The
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone tried to create a pool class for tables? It was pretty straight
> forward for other classes, but the table is not easy to re-use. The table
> model, if I remember correctly, can't easily be changed on the fly. I am
Has anyone tried to create a pool class for tables? It was pretty straight
forward for other classes, but the table is not easy to re-use. The table
model, if I remember correctly, can't easily be changed on the fly. I am
trying to pool all the controls I use so that I get better performance in IE
