Hi Alessandro,
thank you for your work.
Another idea of mine is to replace the document.write things with string
concats and innerHTML. In my opinion innerHTML keeps working - even in
XHTML documents.
If this should work, this is in my opinion the easier way to get a cross
browser XHTML compa
Ciao Sebastian,
> The reason I didn't replace document.write() entirely is that while
> testing I found that
> adding script elements using DOM methods doesn't work reliably in IE 6:
> the script nodes
> gets added, but it seems they are parsed in the wrong order (or not at
> all): the result i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hi Sebastian,
>> sounds quite good. I hope you have found all comparsions of tag names.
>> There are also things like "DIV", "INPUT", "TEXTAREA" inside the qooxdoo
>> code I think.
>>
>>
> Yes, I also found DIV, INPUT, TEXTAREA, IMG, STYLE, HEAD... and converted
>
Hi Sebastian,
> sounds quite good. I hope you have found all comparsions of tag names.
> There are also things like "DIV", "INPUT", "TEXTAREA" inside the qooxdoo
> code I think.
>
>
Yes, I also found DIV, INPUT, TEXTAREA, IMG, STYLE, HEAD... and converted
them. I already rebuilt and tested all
Hi Alessandro,
sounds quite good. I hope you have found all comparsions of tag names.
There are also things like "DIV", "INPUT", "TEXTAREA" inside the qooxdoo
code I think.
I you feel you have found all these cases I think this would be a good
change.
"document.write" is bad style. And this i
Hi all,
I was trying to use qooxdoo in XHTML documents in order to
take advantage of native SVG support in Firefox and Opera, but
I encountered a few problems, manly because tagnames case in the
XHTML DOM is handled differently from the HTML DOM.
While the HTML specifications allow both upperca
