Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Source builds and XHTML documents

2007-01-15 Thread Alessandro Sala
Hello Hugh, I (obviously) completely agree, but at the moment it seems full XHTML support is not a priority; then I followed the implicit Sebastian suggestion and, as I already said, created a separate tool which can post-process the source build replacing the standard source loader in order to

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Source builds and XHTML documents

2007-01-15 Thread Hugh Gibson
> I (obviously) completely agree, but at the moment it seems full XHTML > support is not a priority; then I followed the implicit Sebastian > suggestion and, as I already said, created a separate tool which can > post-process the source build replacing the standard source loader in > order to fully

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Source builds and XHTML documents

2007-01-14 Thread Alessandro Sala
Hello Hugh, Well, it seems nobody is really interested in this issue: am I the only one who is trying to use qooxdoo into XHTML documents? I think it's important to support XHTML - it is the standard, after all. Could the proposed modification by Alessandro be incorporated an

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Source builds and XHTML documents

2007-01-08 Thread Hugh Gibson
> Do you mean we should remove the current loader selection code and > revert to the original, document.write()-only, source loader? That's > not a good move, in my opinion, since we would end up in not even > being able to load an XHTML source build; this would mean making a > release build after

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Source builds and XHTML documents

2007-01-06 Thread Alessandro Sala
Hi Sebastian, I would prefer to clean the stuff up a bit. Normally I think it's OK, to support XHTML in the build version only. If the browsers does not allow us to find a better replacement for document.write() to include scripts dynamically in XHTML pages. In my opinion this would resu

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] Source builds and XHTML documents

2007-01-04 Thread Sebastian Werner
Hi Alessandro! I would prefer to clean the stuff up a bit. Normally I think it's OK, to support XHTML in the build version only. If the browsers does not allow us to find a better replacement for document.write() to include scripts dynamically in XHTML pages. In my opinion this would result in

[qooxdoo-devel] Source builds and XHTML documents

2006-12-29 Thread Alessandro Sala
Hello Sebastian, as you know, after removing the 'domappend' source loader (because of its present unreliability in almost all browsers), support for development of applications inside XHTML documents is now rather poor. As I suggested in my last post, I prepared a patch which adds a new sour