That was exactly what I meaned. Thank you.
Sebastian
Am 27.04.2007 um 20:03 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Yes the better way would be to check for an Interface. But this
>> interface is
>> not yet available. If you wanna help out ;)
>
> That
Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes the better way would be to check for an Interface. But this interface is
> not yet available. If you wanna help out ;)
That was easy. :-) Done.
Derrell
-
This SF.net emai
Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes the better way would be to check for an Interface. But this interface is
> not yet available. If you wanna help out ;)
Why don't you describe in a bit more detail what you envision, and maybe I'll
look into implementing it. Are you saying that
Yes the better way would be to check for an Interface. But this
interface is not yet available. If you wanna help out ;)
Sebastian
Am 27.04.2007 um 17:31 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I've defined my own Range class for use with the Spinner. This worked
> previously, but now Spinner has a ch
Leander Hanwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, this isn't any help, only a question from my side:
> Why do you wrote an own class for controll, that did you class do?
One example is a time selector widget, with spinners for the hours, minutes,
and am/pm selector. The getter for the hours a
Hi
Sorry, this isn't any help, only a question from my side:
Why do you wrote an own class for controll, that did you class do?
Did you class based in qx.type.Range?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> I've defined my own Range class for use with the Spinner. This worked
> previously, but now Spinner
I've defined my own Range class for use with the Spinner. This worked
previously, but now Spinner has a check constraint to ensure that the provided
manager is, explicitly, qx.type.Range. For applications that want to use
their own range manager, how does one modify a the Spinner's check constrai
