Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-05-24 Thread Hugh Gibson
> >> You can also display the entire(recursive hierarchy (or up to some > >> max level) of an object using this: > > > > Are you going to add that to the Wiki as a snippet? If not, I'll > > have a go. > > Sure, go ahead. Added at http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/developer_manual/debugging#int

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-19 Thread Derrell . Lipman
"Hugh Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> You can also display the entire(recursive hierarchy (or up to some >> max level) of an object using this: > > Are you going to add that to the Wiki as a snippet? If not, I'll have a go. Sure, go ahead. This is actually part of a much bigger issue: th

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Hugh Gibson
> You can also display the entire(recursive hierarchy (or up to some > max level) of an object using this: Are you going to add that to the Wiki as a snippet? If not, I'll have a go. Hugh - This SF.net email is sponsored by

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Joe Hudson
] really stupid eval question Hi Derrell, Am 18.04.2007 um 22:31 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > You can also display the entire(recursive hierarchy (or up to some > max level) > of an object using this: > > In 0.6.x: qx.util.Debug.debugObject() > In trunk: qx.dev.Debug.debugObject

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Andreas Junghans
Hi Derrell, Am 18.04.2007 um 22:31 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > You can also display the entire(recursive hierarchy (or up to some > max level) > of an object using this: > > In 0.6.x: qx.util.Debug.debugObject() > In trunk: qx.dev.Debug.debugObject() Nice! I hadn't noticed that class before,

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Derrell . Lipman
Andreas Junghans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Joe, > > Am 18.04.2007 um 21:28 schrieb Joe Hudson: > >> Thanks Andreas. I'm actually working in Firefox 2.0.0.3 > > Ah, OK. I just tested it, and Firefox also needs parentheses. > Strange, I thought it was only IE ... > > As a side note, I'd su

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Joe Hudson
Thank you very much Andreas. That is very helpful! Joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Junghans Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:58 PM To: qooxdoo Development Subject: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question Hi Joe, Am

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Andreas Junghans
Hi Joe, Am 18.04.2007 um 21:28 schrieb Joe Hudson: > Thanks Andreas. I'm actually working in Firefox 2.0.0.3 Ah, OK. I just tested it, and Firefox also needs parentheses. Strange, I thought it was only IE ... As a side note, I'd suggest using qooxdoo's more powerful logging/ debugging facil

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Joe Hudson
Thanks Andreas. I'm actually working in Firefox 2.0.0.3 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Junghans Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:20 PM To: qooxdoo Development Subject: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question Hi Joe

Re: [qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Andreas Junghans
Hi Joe, Am 18.04.2007 um 20:27 schrieb Joe Hudson: > Hi, I’ve been going crazy because I think this should work but I > keep dying > on the following eval statement: > > alert("test 1"); // this works > alert(eval('{"id":2,"testBoolean":false}')); // never see this > alert("test 2"); > > I kno

[qooxdoo-devel] really stupid eval question

2007-04-18 Thread Joe Hudson
Hi, I’ve been going crazy because I think this should work but I keep dying on the following eval statement: alert("test 1"); // this works alert(eval('{"id":2,"testBoolean":false}')); // never see this alert("test 2"); I know I'm missing something really obvious here but I've been racking my br