On 28/08/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gordon Sim wrote:
> > Martin Ritchie wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Can someone explain to me the warnings I'm seeing from the python tests
> >> ([java][OUT] has been prepended by maven)
> >>
> >> [java] [OUT]Using specification from: ../specs
Gordon Sim wrote:
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Hi,
Can someone explain to me the warnings I'm seeing from the python tests
([java][OUT] has been prepended by maven)
[java] [OUT]Using specification from: ../specs\amqp.0-8.xml
[java] [OUT]Warning: duplicate id: Constant(name=xa_rbrollback,
i
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Hi,
Can someone explain to me the warnings I'm seeing from the python tests
([java][OUT] has been prepended by maven)
[java] [OUT]Using specification from: ../specs\amqp.0-8.xml
[java] [OUT]Warning: duplicate id: Constant(name=xa_rbrollback, id=1)
[java] [OU
Hi,
Can someone explain to me the warnings I'm seeing from the python tests
([java][OUT] has been prepended by maven)
[java] [OUT]Using specification from: ../specs\amqp.0-8.xml
[java] [OUT]Warning: duplicate id: Constant(name=xa_rbrollback, id=1)
[java] [OUT]Warning: duplicate id:
I thing gmail might have filtered that attachment out for some people. Try:
http://del.icio.us/rupertlssmith/maven
Rupert
On 02/08/07, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Here is the set of maven links I have compiled. This has been a usefull
> resource for me.
>
> Rupert
>
> On 02/08/
Here is the set of maven links I have compiled. This has been a usefull
resource for me.
Rupert
On 02/08/07, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Welcome to Maven hell Rafael!
>
> On 02/08/07, Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Martin Ritchie wrote:
> > > On 02/08/07, Gord
On 02/08/07, Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Ritchie wrote:
> > On 02/08/07, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Martin Ritchie wrote:
> >>> On 01/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> A python test execution fails on the broker
Welcome to Maven hell Rafael!
On 02/08/07, Rafael Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin Ritchie wrote:
> > On 02/08/07, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Martin Ritchie wrote:
> >>> On 01/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> A python te
Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 02/08/07, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 01/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin,
A python test execution fails on the broker in trunk.
As hack I get around by skipping them.
Can you please look into it.
Regards,
On 02/08/07, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Ritchie wrote:
> > On 01/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Martin,
> >>
> >> A python test execution fails on the broker in trunk.
> >> As hack I get around by skipping them.
> >> Can you please look into it.
> >>
> >
Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 01/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin,
A python test execution fails on the broker in trunk.
As hack I get around by skipping them.
Can you please look into it.
Regards,
Rajith
I hope to have time to look at trunk again next week. Did the test
On 01/08/07, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> A python test execution fails on the broker in trunk.
> As hack I get around by skipping them.
> Can you please look into it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
I hope to have time to look at trunk again next week. Did the test
just start
Martin,
A python test execution fails on the broker in trunk.
As hack I get around by skipping them.
Can you please look into it.
Regards,
Rajith
Cool, I'm guessing by 'build every build' you mean build and run tests
on every build. So can you tell what change broke the Java broker. I
run all the java test on a regular basis I just keep forgetting the
python ones, though I was good and remembered for a while. I have it
on my list to integra
Martin,
We build every check in on the source tree, I will see if we can link
the page externally. Also does
anyone mind if that machine auro mails the list with build failures / blame.
Carl.
Martin Ritchie wrote:
oh dear Qpid java people,
We have been caught committing and not running th
oh dear Qpid java people,
We have been caught committing and not running the python tests.
I say we as I'm probably the culprit but running the test after
finally putting a topic matching solution in.. Thinking we would be
fully passing the python tests only to find we have three new
failures.
16 matches
Mail list logo