Thanks very much to Cliff, James & Paul - this is great news.
Regards,
Marnie
On 11/2/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/2/06, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we have a PPMC now ?
The three mentors (James, Paul, and myself) all felt like the PPMC
should inclu
On 11/2/06, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we have a PPMC now ?
The three mentors (James, Paul, and myself) all felt like the PPMC
should include all the committers who expressed an interest by the
deadline. We looked at the commits, mail list participation, and JIRA
involvemen
Hi Cliff,
Do we have a PPMC now ?
We're getting the M1 release organised now, and it'd be good to finalise the
PPMC membership in order to facilitate the release process.
Thanks & Regards,
Marnie
Hi Folks,
Sorry for the late reply but I would also like to be on the list.
Regards,
Sam.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 October 2006 22:44
> To: qpid-dev-apache
> Subject: Re: Establishing a PPMC (was Re: Private list)
>
I'd like to be included in the PPMC.
John
On 24/10/06, Kim van der Riet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to participate in the PPMC.
Kim
I would like to participate in the PPMC.
Kim
I'd also like to be on the PPMC.
Hi,
Please include me also in PPMC.
Thanks and regards,
Bhupendra Bhardwaj
On 10/24/06, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to be included in the PPMC please.
Thanks,
Marnie
On 10/24/06, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> > Now that we've got
I'd like to be included in the PPMC please.
Thanks,
Marnie
On 10/24/06, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> Now that we've got responses from all three mentors that this process
> seems reasonable, I'd suggest that all committers interested in
> participating in the P
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Now that we've got responses from all three mentors that this process
seems reasonable, I'd suggest that all committers interested in
participating in the PPMC speak up now.
Shall we say, speak up (reply to this thread) in the next 72 hours
(Thursday, Noon PDT / 19:00 UDT) t
I'd also like to be on the PPMC.
Thanks
On 24/10/06, Rafael H. Schloming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to participate in the PPMC as well.
--Rafael
Robert Greig wrote:
> On 23/10/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Now that we've got responses from all three mentors that t
I'd like to participate in the PPMC as well.
--Rafael
Robert Greig wrote:
On 23/10/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that we've got responses from all three mentors that this process
seems reasonable, I'd suggest that all committers interested in
participating in the PPMC speak
On Oct 23, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Robert Greig wrote:
On 23/10/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that we've got responses from all three mentors that this process
seems reasonable, I'd suggest that all committers interested in
participating in the PPMC speak up now.
Shall we say, sp
I'd also like to be on the list.
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 15:37 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> May I also be on the list.
>
> Carl.
>
> Robert Greig wrote:
> > On 23/10/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Now that we've got responses from all three mentors that this process
> >> se
May I also be on the list.
Carl.
Robert Greig wrote:
On 23/10/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that we've got responses from all three mentors that this process
seems reasonable, I'd suggest that all committers interested in
participating in the PPMC speak up now.
Shall we s
On 23/10/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that we've got responses from all three mentors that this process
seems reasonable, I'd suggest that all committers interested in
participating in the PPMC speak up now.
Shall we say, speak up (reply to this thread) in the next 72 hours
On 10/18/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm finally getting back to the PPMC discussion (see below for a
reminder of where we left off)...
Some of you may have read some of the debate about how to set up the
PPMC on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list a few weeks ago (if you're a
committer,
+1 from me too.
Paul
PS I don't disagree with that definition of active either.
On 10/23/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1, sounds fine to me.
On 10/20/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cliff
>
> I've read your note a couple of times.
>
> In summary it seems to sa
On 10/20/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cliff
I've read your note a couple of times.
In summary it seems to say that:
1. all *active* committers can join the PPMC
2. they don't have to
3. the mentors decide who is active
Unless I missed something, I'm +1 on that.
I think we're
John,
I've answered your questions below, but I don't think this is directly
related to bootstrapping the PPMC. The PPMC will be populated from
the set of initial committers. It seems that your questions below are
mainly about how someone goes from being a contributor to becoming a
committer.
+1, sounds fine to me.
On 10/20/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cliff
I've read your note a couple of times.
In summary it seems to say that:
1. all *active* committers can join the PPMC
2. they don't have to
3. the mentors decide who is active
Unless I missed something, I'm +1
John
Firstly, I apologize for any lack of mentorship! I'll make more effort.
And, yes I agree that contribution is not just code. Some of the most
useful contributors in Apache are people to write documentation! They
are also some of the rarest :-)
Paul
On 10/20/06, John O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECT
Recalling Cliff's initial briefing of the Qpid project members prior to
entering the incubator, a "committer" is really a "contributer".
So:
- Posting and managing JIRA's
- Participating constructively in the mailing lists
- Creating documentation
- Checking in code
These are all valuable contrib
I agree.
On 20/10/06, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cliff & All,
I'd like to suggest that we timebound the PPMC process discussion.
Qpid needs a PPMC assembled to facilitate an M1 release prior to some of
the
more significant work on the java broker (see the project JIRA for an
Cliff
I've read your note a couple of times.
In summary it seems to say that:
1. all *active* committers can join the PPMC
2. they don't have to
3. the mentors decide who is active
Unless I missed something, I'm +1 on that.
Paul
On 10/19/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd first
+1
-Original Message-
From: Marnie McCormack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 10:07 AM
To: qpid-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James Strachan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mentor Response Reqd: Establishing a PPMC (was Re: Private
list)
Cliff &
+1
On Oct 20, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Marnie McCormack wrote:
Cliff & All,
I'd like to suggest that we timebound the PPMC process discussion.
Qpid needs a PPMC assembled to facilitate an M1 release prior to
some of the
more significant work on the java broker (see the project JIRA for
an idea
Cliff & All,
I'd like to suggest that we timebound the PPMC process discussion.
Qpid needs a PPMC assembled to facilitate an M1 release prior to some of the
more significant work on the java broker (see the project JIRA for an idea
of the work in the pipeline).
There are existing users out ther
I'd first like to hear what the other mentors (James and Paul) think
about the process/guidelines I've proposed.
Cliff
On 10/19/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cliff,
I am happy with this process, would the next step be to put names
forward to
be voted into the PPMC?
Regards
Ca
Cliff,
I am happy with this process, would the next step be to put names
forward to
be voted into the PPMC?
Regards
Carl.
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
I'm finally getting back to the PPMC discussion (see below for a
reminder of where we left off)...
Some of you may have read some of the debate
I'm finally getting back to the PPMC discussion (see below for a
reminder of where we left off)...
Some of you may have read some of the debate about how to set up the
PPMC on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list a few weeks ago (if you're a
committer, you really should be subscribed to that list -- lots
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> here's the question:
> should every committer automatically be a member of the PPMC?
> Or should only a smaller set of committers (the people most
> directly responsible for most of the existing work to date)
> be on the PPMC until they vote to bring in others?
>
few requests to subscribe to the private-qpid
list, so far they have not
been confirmed as I believe we first need to discuss how we want to deal
with the private list.
Cliff,
Can you please provide us with what the other projects typically do with
regard to who they put on
the private list?
Yeah - I
There have been quite a few requests to subscribe to the private-qpid
list, so far they have not
been confirmed as I believe we first need to discuss how we want to deal
with the private list.
Cliff,
Can you please provide us with what the other projects typically do with
regard to who
34 matches
Mail list logo
