On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:04:52AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> The more correct variation would be to say that you could nuke
> PIPELINING from the EHLO and then do as I suggested.
Yeah, that'd work. So far, the abuse I've seen has used HELO rather
than EHLO, not that it needs to. In fact
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Devin Carraway wrote:
> > Since we don't claim to support pipelining (rfc 2920) anyway, you
> > could do a hack to flush the input buffer when there's an SMTP
> > failure. That should ruin their session pretty efficiently. :-)
>
> We don't? The PIPELINING keyword is listed
