On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:33 pm, Devin Carraway wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:08:31AM -0800, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> > I'd like to hear how it works over a few weeks or so. I fear that
> > some "real" SMTP clients send the HELO as soon as they are
> > connected.
>
> Sure, I'll continue to ke
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:08:31AM -0800, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> I'd like to hear how it works over a few weeks or so. I fear that
> some "real" SMTP clients send the HELO as soon as they are
> connected.
Sure, I'll continue to keep an eye on the logs. Any MTA/MUA that would
dequeue mail wit
Here's a rewritten spamassassin plugin that has no issues with
SpamAssassin 2.50. I ripped out all the attempt at speaking the SA
network protocol and just used spamc, which already knows how. This is
very slightly slower than the old way, but much more future-resistant,
and a great deal faster t
On a steady pace to release 1.00 sometime later this century.
Get it from CVS or from
http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/files/qpsmtpd-0.25.tar.gz
Thanks to all who contributed! Please let me know if I left
anything out. Change list below.
- ask
0.25 - 2003/03/18
Use the proper RFC282
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Skaag Argonius wrote:
> Is this some technique used by spammers to crash spamassassin?
Are you using SA 2.50? SpamAssassin broke the network protocol we
use with that release.
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/188
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjo
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Skaag Argonius wrote:
> A: I know this may seem trivial and/or stupid for you perl gurus! but I
> still think it will be a good idea to include the list of dependencies [...]
Certainly. I've added a blip to the README file. Thank you!
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http:/
