On Sunday, Sep 14, 2003, at 16:25 America/Los_Angeles, James H.
Thompson wrote:
I've been looking at the memory usage of qpsmtpd.
When you are running a 100 copies, it starts to add up.
If you used PPerl, wouldn't most of it get shared?
I wrote a small test program to track the memory requiremen
Hey all.
I upgraded from 0.20 to 0.26 the other day. I'd made some custom
changes/additions to some of the plugins (more logging and some regex matching),
so I copies those over where necessary.
I'm now seeing all kinds of sessions staying open, eating up resources. Any
idea which plugin mig
On Monday, Sep 15, 2003, at 07:51 America/Los_Angeles, Bryan Scott
wrote:
I upgraded from 0.20 to 0.26 the other day. I'd made some custom
changes/additions to some of the plugins (more logging and some regex
matching), so I copies those over where necessary.
I'm now seeing all kinds of sessi
(Forgot to CC the list in my response to Ask.)
>> I upgraded from 0.20 to 0.26 the other day. I'd made some custom
changes/additions to some of the plugins (more logging and some regex matching),
so I copies those over where necessary.
>>
>> I'm now seeing all kinds of sessions staying open, ea
At Mon, 15 Sep 2003 04:01:22 -0700,
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, Sep 14, 2003, at 16:25 America/Los_Angeles, James H.
> Thompson wrote:
>
> > I've been looking at the memory usage of qpsmtpd.
> > When you are running a 100 copies, it starts to add up.
>
> If you used PPerl, wouldn'
On 15 Sep 2003, at 12:01, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
use POSIX qw(strftime) consumed: 340 KB bytes
Hmn, it's only used to format the date for the received header.
I wonder if Time::Piece 1.x is lighter...
use Net::DNS consumed: 1764 KB bytes
Ouch. I think it's only used by some of the plugins, but
Robert Spier wrote:
>At Mon, 15 Sep 2003 04:01:22 -0700,
>Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, Sep 14, 2003, at 16:25 America/Los_Angeles, James H.
>> Thompson wrote:
>>
>> > I've been looking at the memory usage of qpsmtpd.
>> > When you are running a 100 copies, it starts to add up.
>>
>
> >> If you used PPerl, wouldn't most of it get shared?
> >Yes.
>
> I'm wondering if this is the case, as it looks like pperl does a
> fork for each child which would copy all of the perl code and data
> to a new process -- i.e. no sharing of the perl code or data.
Modern operating systems use co
